Sunday, August 19, 2012

California doesn't exist, It's 2 states


California Doesn't Exist—It's Now Two States

 Posted 

Driving across California is like going from Mississippi to Massachusetts without crossing a state line. Consider the disconnects:
• California's combined income and sales taxes are among the nation's highest, but the state's deficit is still about $16 billion.
• It's estimated that more than 2,000 upper-income Californians are leaving per week to flee high taxes and costly regulations, yet California wants to raise taxes even higher.
• Its business climate already ranks near the bottom of most surveys. Its teachers are among the highest paid on average in the nation, but its public school students consistently test near the bottom in math and science.
• Public employees enjoy some of the nation's most generous compensation, but state retirement systems are underfunded by about $300 billion.
• The state's gas taxes — at over 49 cents per gallon — are among the highest in the nation, but its once-unmatched freeways, like the 101 and 99, for long stretches have degenerated into potholed, clogged nightmares.
• The state wishes to borrow billions of dollars to develop high-speed rail, beginning with a little-traveled link between Fresno and Corcoran — a corridor already served by money-losing Amtrak. Apparently, coastal residents like the idea of European high-speed rail — as long as construction doesn't begin in their backyards.
• As gas prices soar, California chooses not to tap millions of barrels of oil and even more natural gas offshore and below ground.
• Home to bankrupt green companies like Solyndra, California has mandated a third of all energy provided by state utilities soon must come from renewable energy sources — largely wind and solar, which now provide about 11% of its electricity and almost none of its transportation fuel.
How to explain the seemingly inexplicable? There is no California. It is a misnomer. There is no such state. Instead there are two radically different cultures and landscapes with little in common, each equally dysfunctional in quite different ways. Apart they are unworldly, together a disaster.
A postmodern coastal corridor runs from San Diego to Berkeley, where the weather is ideal, the gentrified affluent make good money, and values are green and left-wing. This Shangri-La is juxtaposed to a vast impoverished interior, from the southern desert to the northern Central Valley, where life's becoming pre-modern.
Near the coast, blue-chip universities like Cal Tech, Berkeley, Stanford and UCLA in pastoral landscapes train the world's doctors, lawyers, engineers and businesspeople. In the hot interior of blue-collar Sacramento, Turlock, Fresno and Bakersfield, over half the incoming freshman in the California State University system must take remedial math and science.

In postmodern Palo Alto or Santa Monica, a small cottage costs more than $1 million. Two hours from the Bay Area, in pre-modern and now-bankrupt Stockton, a bungalow the same size goes for less than $100,000.
In the interior, joblessness in many areas peaks at over 15%. The theft of copper wire is reaching epidemic proportions. Thousands of the shrinking middle class flee the interior for the coast or nearby no-income-tax states.
To fathom the state's nearly unbelievable statistics, visit the state's hinterlands. As the state population grew by 10 million from the mid-1980s to 2005, its number of Medicaid recipients increased by 7 million. One-third of the nation's welfare recipients now reside in California.
But in the Never-Never Land of Apple, Facebook, Google, Hollywood and the wine country, millions live in an idyllic paradise.
Coastal Californians can afford to worry about the state's trivia — as their legislators seek to outlaw foie gras, shut down irrigation projects to save the 3-inch delta smelt and allow children to have legally recognized multiple parents.
But in the less feel-good interior, crippling regulations curb timber, gas and oil, and farm production. For the most part, the rules are mandated by coastal utopians who have little idea where the gas for their imported cars comes from, or how the redwood is cut for their decks, or who grows the ingredients for their Mediterranean lunches of arugula, olive oil and pasta.
On the coast, it's politically incorrect to talk of illegal immigration.
In the interior, residents see first-hand the bankrupting effects on schools, courts and health care when millions arrive illegally without English-language fluency or a high school diploma — and send back billions of dollars to Mexico and other Latin American countries.
The drive from Fresno to Palo Alto takes three hours, but you might as well be rocketing from Earth to the moon.

So much for the Golden State.

5 comments:

  1. Two states all right, one with water and one without. Mark my words, this state will divide over water if given enough time. Southern CA doesn't have any sours of water and yet they have grown to an uncontrollable size in population and industry. Northern CA has everything it needs and it is time we the the Bay area and Southern CA to get screwed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Angie,

      Isn't there plan to bring freshwater down to the southern half?

      Here's a source:

      http://www.calitics.com/tag/Arnold%20Schwarzenegger/

      15,000 CFS (1,296 MGD) is, umm, a LOT of water. The $20B to $50B price tag is (sorry) pricey, and we know of the central government's highly touted ability to estimate costs.

      Delete
    2. We would be much better off ecologically and financially if we were to do much of it with dams but that will not happen either. California could solve much of its water needs and energy with dams and look how that has turned out.... shaking my head... this state needs to split ...

      Delete
  2. And the High Speed Rail is stupid. They know that it will bankrupt them, they are just counting on a Federal Government bailout. They better hope a Democrat is in office when that happens. IMHO, they never contemplated a republicans EVER being elected to President again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Does the Constitution speak about a State's bailout? NO! Liberal State's are going have to default on obligations and start over. California along with Illinois are on the fiscal tracks to hell and the people (on the dole), and the generous benefits promised to public workers are going to have to shoulder the burden.

    ReplyDelete