Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Why won't the NY Times report on Ambassador's Stevens Rape?

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/09/13/reports-murdered-ambassador-libya-sexually-raped-183571/

 http://www.examiner.com/article/lebanese-report-us-ambassador-raped-before-murdered

 http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/stevens.asp

4 comments:

  1. Because they are still part of the MSM

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is plenty to be upset about over our actions in Libya, but what you are most upset about is that we aren't hearing enough details about Ambassador Steven's being raped? I guess your outrage and need for revenge against Obama trumps letting Steven's family keep some dignity. What you want is your message of Obama's fuck up to shadow anything good that can be said of Steven's.

    Good thing this country has so many patriots like the two of you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Why won't the NY Times report on Ambassador's Stevens Rape?"

    Because the only report of the incident has been discredited.

    See Update 2, posted on Sept 15:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/sep/13/picket-report-murdered-us-ambassador-libya-reporte/

    Hard to say for sure what happened, but as it stands right now, there's nothing for the NY Times to report on. Tayyar.org reported something, but their (supposed) source said it was bogus. Not much of a story there, at least not with the info that's currently available.

    ReplyDelete