Saturday, October 27, 2012

CNBC Exec’s Children Murdered, 1 Day After CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit

CNBC Exec’s Children Murdered, 1 Day After CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit By JG Vibes theintelhub.com October 27, 2012 This week financial news organization CNBC gave some mainstream attention to the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History, in which “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners are being accused of laundering of 43 trillion dollars worth of ill gotten gains. The lawsuit is said to involve officials located in the highest offices of government and the financial sector. Since this information was surprisingly revealed by the mainstream news organization there has been a very suspicious and deadly fallout at the CNBC headquarters. Within hours the original page for the article was taken down, and CNBC senior vice president Kevin Krim received news that his children were killed under very suspicious circumstances. It seems that the murder happened first and then the page was removed later. According to mainstream accounts the children’s nanny is responsible for the murders, allegedly stabbing both children. However, those same mainstream news sources report the highly unlikely story that the nanny slit her own throat just after committing the homicides. Police have released very little information and although a wider plot has not been officially implicated, it seems very possible that these murders are a show of force against the press organization for releasing such damning information about the most powerful people in the world. Here is some more information about the lawsuit from the Wall Street Journal: “In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP — on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws — has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the “Banksters” criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same “Banksters” to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the “Bankster” Defendants. “ Some of the alleged conspirators are: Attorney General Holder, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary, Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. It is expected that all news on this subject will be removed from CNBC, and that other news organizations will be discouraged from covering such information. However, screen shots of the original CNBC article were taken to verify the authenticity of this story. Assassination and brute intimidation are common strategies for the ruling class to use on people who may threaten their agenda. This is the second situation this week in which a high level executive was the victim of a suspicious attack that seemed very much like an assassination. The Intel Hub just reported that Nicholas Mockford, a 60 year old British executive for the oil company ExxonMobil was shot dead in front of his wife in an assassination-style killing in Brussels. We will be keeping a close eye on both of these stories and provide more details as they become available.

12 comments:

  1. Thinking out loud .... who has the most to loose here... keep in mind that the bailout was done under Bush and this does involve the fed. Now the Obama thugs and friends does add to the mix but there is much more here than meets the eye.

    THE question is, Where did the money go? As I said, this was started under Bush and the arbitrary amount of $750 billion was very curious to me. They came up with that figure WITHOUT explanation. IMO, to unravel all the derivatives and ascertain the true amount lost would have taken so time.

    It has been noted that some of the money made its way to foreign banks --- how much is unknown.

    This is more of a question of "auditing the fed" and "tracing the money" being the taboo. There is a lot more here than meets the eye and this just shows that CNBC was getting too close for comfort.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "THE question is, Where did the money go? As I said, this was started under Bush and the arbitrary amount of $750 billion was very curious to me. They came up with that figure WITHOUT explanation. IMO, to unravel all the derivatives and ascertain the true amount lost would have taken so time."

    This is not a hard question to figure out. Multiple books have been written on the subject and countless articles were written about it while the bubble was being created and they were ignored. Here is one link http://www.osc.state.ny.us/press/releases/feb11/022311a.htm scroll down to the bottom of the page and look at the PDF that shows the dollar amount of wall street bonuses paid out by year. That is certainly one place the money went.

    But that's only a piece of it. While wall street traders and execs collectively took in billions, there are likely tens of thousands of small fish all over America who took in hundreds of thousands to millions as compensation to create toxic mortgages. The Big Short is an excellent book that explains a lot of that fiasco.

    The money is not remotely hard to follow. Nor is matching up a timeline of deregulation with points of systemic failure. What is impossible though is to both fix the system and retain a rigid ideological outlook and it doesn't matter if you lean left or right. At the moment, there isn't the political or sociological will to really fix this problem. We are probably just a couple years away from another meltdown and it will have nothing to do with who is in office.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It has become too easy for these guys to pass this off as a difference in political ideology instead of the crime against humanity that it is. Maybe someday we can grow up and start dealing with real issues again instead of arguing bitterly about made up minor differences between political parties that both support the crime.

      Delete
    2. http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2012/10/benghazi-lets-quit-the-chickensht-dancing-around-here-ann-barnhardt-2443876.html

      Delete
    3. OH look Max gave his standard reply ... the capitalist got it .... Max just went BAAAA again .... surprise surprise....

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. "It has become too easy for these guys to pass this off as a difference in political ideology instead of the crime against humanity that it is."

      Stormcloud, this statement is nearly the best thing I have ever read about this topic and I'm not trying to be grandiose. Political ideology, at best, is responsible for providing the means for the rip off, perhaps equal to the handgun of a bankrobber. The much bigger problem is the absolute lack of morality that allowed so many to not only profit from this mess but simultaneously feel justified and feel that they "earned" it. By sticking to arguments of political ideology, we are completely avoiding taking a look in the mirror at what is a much deeper issue of moral and spiritual bankruptcy.

      Delete
  3. This story and the follow up posts are so bizarre it could only happen in America. Read the reference posted by Roj and you can clearly discern the tenor of the thread. I used my own speed reading technique to read the first three paragraphs of the reference and found nothing but self opinionated garbage. The originating post by Angie contains little factual information but plenty of snide insinuations built around a nebulous core of accusations which may or may not be true.
    The law suits referenced have not even rated a mention on MSM (or any other outlet) here and this would be surprising if there was any factual basis. I have not heard of them on the Public Broadcasting hour we receive direct from America each weekday.
    To lay to rest perceived notions I am a Democrat supporter; please believe me when I say my views here are strictly neutral, as they must be from a guest on the site. In Aussie I am a life long conservative voter with a desire to see both sides of the argument before once more voting Conservative!!
    Cheers from Aussie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Well maybe you need to try and read for comprehension then...
      The WSJ has it and so does MW BUT according to Kingston it did not happen unless MSM or networks in his little world say so.... nice little word you live in.... emphasize little..

      Delete
  4. Angie.
    My thanks but the word credibility is troubling me. To be credible a story needs to be supported by facts. Nothing in the article, your submission or the reference quoted by Roj supports anything more than accusations. Why you would care to support these accusations without demons ratable proof is beyond my comprehension, the self same reason you encourage me to read and then lemming like, follow you off the cliff. Thanks Angie, but no thanks, (at least this time round)

    Cheers from Aussie

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://pastehtml.com/view/cgi2dqpym.html

    timeline of stein\spire's "lawsuit"

    ReplyDelete