I told you about six months ago that HRC was a 50/50 bet on running. I moved those odds to 60/40 against about a month ago.
I told you about a month ago that Romney was toast.
I told you about the same time that Christie's candidacy was a pipe dream.
Believe me when I tell you that HRC faces a future full of felony and misdemeanor charges. Classified information held on private servers, much like General Petaous holding classified information in binders at his residence, may preclude HRC from running for elected office. Concealment of information in private emails about Benghazi or other pertinent security matters leaves her looking at felony charges. Raising funds from foreign governments while acting as Secretary of State, and concealing emails relating to those situations also carries large consequences.
This won't happen under this AG. But it may turn out that our latest impeached President has a felon for a wife.
Just sayin.'
The BEST political cartoon about Hillary Clinton hiding her emails by far
Meanwhile, we are now finding out that Hillary Clinton told her
employees at the State Department that the use of personal email
addresses was was strictly forbidden:Her hypocrisy truly knows no bounds.Fox News has exclusively obtained an internal 2011 State Department cable that shows Secretary of State Clinton’s office told employees not to use personal email for security reasons, while at the same time, HRC conducted all government business on a private account. Sent to Diplomatic and Consular Staff in June 2011, the unclassified cable, with Clinton’s electronic signature, makes clear to “avoid conducting official Department from your personal e-mail accounts” and employees should not “auto-forward Department email to personal email accounts which is prohibited by Department policy.”
Read more at http://www.youngcons.com/best-political-cartoon-hillary-clinton-hiding-emails-far/#kaHhG8r8455wb1dc.99
You are a fuckin genius.
ReplyDeleteIt ain't gonna be pretty.
DeleteFork in the road for the Dems. Do they follow HRC down the inevitable path of destruction or do they turn to the Warren-Sanders wing where the majority of the party now resides.
DeleteWhen You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It!
Yogi Berra
WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton said late Wednesday she requested the State Department to disclose all of her e-mails from her tenure as the nation's top diplomat, amid controversy over the use of a private account for government business.
ReplyDeleteClinton posted on Twitter shortly before midnight Wednesday that she wants the public to see her e-mail, marking the first time she has commented publicly about the controversy.
"I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible," she said.
State spokeswoman Marie Harf said the department will review the e-mails provided by Clinton. "We will undertake this review as quickly as possible," Harf said. "Given the sheer volume of the document set, this review will take some time to complete."
Clinton's tweet came after a day of maneuvering over her use of a private e-mail system, which was first reported earlier this week by The New York Times. The former secretary of State has been widely reported as moving toward a 2016 presidential bid, and she is leading all early polls for the Democratic nomination.
Clinton reportedly used a private e-mail server installed in her home and her own Internet domain — clintonemails.com — to conduct public business during her tenure as Secretary of State. When the State Department requested that she return those government records, she provided the department with 55,000 pages of e-mails, the department has said.
But Republicans are demanding an independent investigation to review all her e-mails, not just the ones she "handpicked for release."
"Hillary Clinton must think we're all suckers. The fact Hillary Clinton set up a 'homebrewed' email system in her house to skirt federal recordkeeping regulations is a pretty good indicator of just how transparent she's interested in being," said Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short.
The House Select Committee on Benghazi on Wednesday already has about 300 pages of those e-mails, and on Wednesday issued subpoenas for the rest to the State Department and to Clinton individually. Spokesman Jamal Ware the select committee — which is investigating the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya — issued letters to unnamed Internet companies instructing them to preserve records relevant to the investigation.
The panel said it has records with two different e-mail addresses used by Clinton. which she controlled on her own server at clintonemail.com. Harf said there is only one e-mail account and that the use of private e-mail was not prohibited during Clinton's four-year tenure.
Contributing: Catalina Camia
USA Today
"The panel said it has records with two different e-mail addresses used by Clinton. which she controlled on her own server at clintonemail.com. Harf said there is only one e-mail account,,,"
DeleteThis won't happen under this AG. But it may turn out that our latest impeached President has a felon for a wife. Lifted from the Post by William above.
DeleteIt seems to me that this sentence and the wording thereof is deliberately framed to smear Bill and HRC for purely political purposes.
If HRC was not a potential candidate, and the outright favorite to defeat any republican candidate, would this grubby smear campaign have the oxygen to be self supporting?.
Does not the quote above infer that the present AG will not prosecute HRC but that if elected, a Republican AG may well do so? If this be the case, William appears to accept that there is bias within the law according to the color of the accused party membership card.
I would trust that I have misconstrued the facts, if I have not, then justice in the greatest nation in the world is following down the same path as was followed in Rome in 44BC.I say to you William, Beware the ides of March.
"Operating her own server would have afforded Clinton additional legal opportunities to block government or private subpoenas in criminal, administrative or civil cases because her lawyers could object in court before being forced to turn over any emails."
Deletehttp://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_27640513/ferguson-report?source=inthenews
Independent hackers confirmed that HRC had many private email accounts running through a server that housed her State Department emails.
HRC has asked the State department to turn over private emails that she gave to them. Why won't she turn over the emails? Why won't she turn over the server?
HDR22@clintonemail.com
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2015/03/new-york-times-hillarys-exclusive-use-of-private-email-as-sec-of-state-a-serious-breach/
"I would trust that I have misconstrued the facts, if I have not, then justice in the greatest nation in the world is following down the same path as was followed in Rome in 44BC.I say to you William, Beware the ides of March."
ReplyDeleteHeres some interesting reading King http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/department-of-justice-report-on-the-ferguson-mo-police-department/1435/
In January 2009, when she was testifying to become Secretary of State, that very week she registered her private clintonemail.com domain name. Hillary Clinton’s team was warned by the State Department’s technology experts about using the private email system, but her political advisers ignored them. As reported by Al Jazeera America:
DeleteState Department technology experts expressed security concerns that then–Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was using a private email service rather than the government’s fortified and monitored system, but those fears fell on deaf ears, a current employee on the department’s cybersecurity team told Al Jazeera America on Tuesday.
The employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing his job, said it was well known that Clinton’s emails were at greater risk of being hacked, intercepted or monitored, but the warnings were ignored.
“We tried,” the employee said. “We told people in her office that it wasn’t a good idea. They were so uninterested that I doubt the secretary was ever informed.”
That’s responsible and transparent?
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/264485-2-8-flashbacks-hillary-clintons-emails/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Politics
DeleteMaxwell says the weekend document session was held in the basement of the State Department’s Foggy Bottom headquarters in a room underneath the “jogger’s entrance.” He describes it as a large space, outfitted with computers and big screen monitors, intended for emergency planning, and with small offices on the periphery.
When he arrived, Maxwell says he observed boxes and stacks of documents. He says a State Department office director, whom Maxwell described as close to Clinton’s top advisers, was there.
His aide was also there and though she worked for him, he was not told of her Sunday file purging duties…
“She told me, ‘Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,’” says Maxwell. He says “seventh floor” was State Department shorthand for then-Secretary of State Clinton and her principal advisers.
They were essentially creating two piles: The things the Accountability Review Board and that Congress would see and anything else that would shed quote ‘bad light’ on Hillary Clinton and her senior management that they were put in a different pile and they were never to be seen.
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/09/178074-former-state-department-official-claims-benghazi-cover/
This story gained just a little exposure on National TV a day or so back. There was no response from the public here so the alleged story died a natural death. There has. over the past few years, emerged a more raw and antagonistic picture of American politics, we did not like what we saw and the sensationalism has now spread to our media. Debate is always good but unsubstantiated innuendo particularly by sections of the media and TV talking heads; can give a false impression of a country and its people to those with an interest but no first hand experience of the country concerned.
ReplyDeleteWhat we see as interested observers, our nose pressed firmly against your living room windows, is division before collegial interaction. Red against Blue and rhetoric before reasoning. I was thinking about this late last night and I was reminded of some of the rhetoric both before and after the events at Fort Sumter in 1861. Students will be aware that there was a whole lot of noise and smoke during the shelling, a lot of hot air expended and no casualties apart from an accidental explosion in a Confederate gun.
Perhaps there should be an embargo on vitriol and unsubstantiated allegations from both sides. Perhaps reason could prevail if a movement could rise from the masses and look for the cause of so much of the trouble we see. I am sure that the core values of the Reds and the Blues are directed towards the betterment of your nation. What we see however is the constant positioning and re positioning as each side readies itself for the next great struggle for control of the tree on which grows the golden apples. In the meantime the nation is allowed to suffer and the economy to bleed to death. Perhaps the core of those golden apples will have to rot before America reinvents herself, Empires and nations in the past have flourished and then allowed themselves to wither and die through over indulgence or lack of good government.
Cheers from Aussie