Monday, June 15, 2015

Time to Get Serious

This report from Bloomberg Politics on the Clinton vs. Bush Race:
With Republican Jeb Bush's official campaign kickoff from Miami, two days after Democrat Hillary Clinton's first major stump speech from New York, the two marquee legacy names of the 2016 presidential race are in it now, for real.

One is mostly running against herself. The other is still trying to separate himself from the pack, not to mention his sometimes inconvenient political dynasty. Both are haunted by the notion of becoming some version of the 2008 Clinton, a supposedly prohibitive favorite who lost the expectations game and, ultimately, the nomination, to a political upstart.

Clinton, a former U.S. senator and secretary of state, one-time presidential candidate, and wife of a former president, and Bush, a former Florida governor and the son and brother of former presidents, both hold the claims on experience, advisers, and donors to make them the candidates to beat in their respective parties. Each would have liked to scare off the competition or at least put enough distance behind them to set the pace, stockpile cash, and leave the details and the fighting for later. 

Of the two, Bush is having by far the more difficult time trying to secure the dominant position in his party's nominating contest. Yet Clinton can't coast either. The surprising enthusiasm for Senator Bernie Sanders's challenge; controversies over Clinton's use of private e-mail for government business; and the finances of her family's foundation, as well as her awkward attempt to keep from alienating either side in Democrats' divisive free trade fight, all signal weaknesses that might might be a drag in the general election.

“They've got to figure, 'It's going to be a competitive race, how do I now distinguish myself?'” said Vin Weber, a former Minnesota congressman and outside adviser to Bush. Weber said that will necessitate “a message that resonates” and said that will provide more substance, earlier. “You're already seeing it from Clinton, you're going to see it from Bush, and I think you'll probably see it from the other candidates. That's an optimist's view, but that's my view.”

Clinton never expected an easy ride, said Ann Lewis, one of her former senior advisers. Her early emphasis on talking to small groups was aimed at connecting personally, which she didn't do well enough eight years ago. “There's a cost to that,” Lewis said. “The cost is that it leaves more space for some other issues, i.e. the e-mails, the questions about the foundation, to get perhaps equal billing at this point, to get more time.”

Now, Lewis said, “Stage One is over. Stage Two is beginning.”


  1. This from candidate Ted Cruz: "Gov. Bush brings a lifetime of service to this field, and his candidacy ensures our eventual nominee will be all the stronger and equipped to face Hillary Clinton in the general election." []

    1. Much as I'm not really happy about it, I'm not really sure I see anyone in the Democratic party who can pull up equal to Hillary. I think Elizabeth Warren could excite a lot of people who are already inclined to vote Democratic, but she is not going to do anything for now, and maybe never.
      Guys like Webb are interesting to me, and it would be nice to see Bernie put a few dents in Hillary's 1% funded armor. The Benghazi stuff and the email stuff are things that I tend to think are important to no one but people who are never going to vote for her anyway. It probably makes sense for Republicans to just keep assuming she will be the nominee.

  2. What a pathetic country we have become to nominate either Bush or Clinton.

    So many good people that could bring good things to this country and we end up with the retreads.