Thursday, September 18, 2014

Why Benghazi will never end




With out the ongoing attempts at Character assassination you simply can't beat her.




Election 2016 Presidential Polls

Tuesday, September 16

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +7
Clinton +5
Bush +2
Huckabee +1
Clinton +8

Monday, September 15

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Paul +5
Clinton +49
Friday, September 12
Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Huckabee +9
Clinton +38
Tuesday, September 09

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +8
Clinton +8
Clinton +2
Clinton +9
Clinton +7
Clinton +15



Clinton +12
Clinton +10
Clinton +11
Clinton +12
Clinton +14

Wednesday, August 27

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +56
Huckabee +2

Wednesday, August 20

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +7
Clinton +5
Clinton +4
Clinton +1
Clinton +6

Thursday, August 14

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Tie
Clinton +6
Clinton +7
Clinton +6

Wednesday, August 06

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Christie +1
Clinton +1
Bush +1
Christie +7
Paul +5
Bush +6
Clinton +10
Perry +1
Thursday, July 31

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +9
Clinton +4
Clinton +11

Monday, July 28

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Tie
Clinton +52
Clinton +10
Clinton +11
Clinton +13
Sunday, July 27

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Christie +1
Clinton +57

Thursday, July 24

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +21
Clinton +16
Clinton +7
Clinton +14
Clinton +13
Bush +3
Clinton +59

Wednesday, July 23

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +11
Christie +9
Clinton +10
Clinton +10
Clinton +9
Thursday, July 17

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Tie
Paul +1
Clinton +2
Paul +3
Clinton +4
Clinton +3
Clinton +1
Tie
Clinton +4
Clinton +9
Clinton +13
Clinton +12
Clinton +5
Clinton +3
Clinton +5
Clinton +5
Clinton +9
Clinton +13

Thursday, July 10

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +45
Christie +5
Wednesday, July 09

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +4

Tuesday, July 08

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Paul +1
Clinton +47
Clinton +9
Clinton +9
Clinton +7
Clinton +7
Clinton +9

Wednesday, July 02

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +13
Clinton +10
Clinton +10
Clinton +12
Clinton +16

Wednesday, June 25

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +14

Monday, June 23

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +14
Clinton +7
Clinton +11
Clinton +13
Clinton +14
Clinton +8
Clinton +6
Clinton +13
Clinton +6
Clinton +7

Thursday, June 19

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Tie

 

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +4

Tuesday, July 08

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Paul +1
Clinton +47
Clinton +9
Clinton +9
Clinton +7
Clinton +7
Clinton +9

Wednesday, July 02

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +13
Clinton +10
Clinton +10
Clinton +12
Clinton +16

Wednesday, June 25

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +14

Monday, June 23

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +14
Clinton +7
Clinton +11
Clinton +13
Clinton +14
Clinton +8
Clinton +6
Clinton +13
Clinton +6
Clinton +7

Thursday, June 19

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Tie
Clinton +4
Clinton +3
Clinton +1
Clinton +3

Sunday, June 15

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Paul +2

Friday, June 13

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +7
Clinton +9
Clinton +9
Clinton +11

Thursday, June 12

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Bush +16
Clinton +58
Clinton +8
Clinton +6
Clinton +1
Clinton +7
Clinton +4
Clinton +11

Wednesday, June 11

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +6
Bush +9

Monday, June 09

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +9
Clinton +14
Clinton +11
Clinton +11
Clinton +10

 
Sunday, June 08

 
Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +10
Clinton +57

Thursday, June 05

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +4
Clinton +14
Clinton +16
Clinton +12
Clinton +15
Clinton +10
Clinton +14
Clinton +14
Clinton +15
Clinton +19
Bush +12
Clinton +38

Thursday, May 22

 
Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Huckabee +5
Clinton +47
Clinton +6
Clinton +4
Clinton +5
Clinton +4
Clinton +7

 
Thursday, May 15

Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)
Poll
Results
Spread
Clinton +8
Clinton +8
Clinton +9
Clinton +8
Clinton +7
Clinton +7
Clinton +14

 

 





Posted by at

21 comments:

  1. Max YasgurSeptember 18, 2014 at 2:41 PM

    I think Benghazi is making it's final stand right now. Despite the fact that nothing has been achieved other than Republican fund raising, this fall will likely be the last time this issue can be used to whip the mindless into a frenzy to show up and vote against Democrats. Nobody but anti democrats will be moved by this when and if Hillary runs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. rick0427September 19, 2014 at 4:28 AM

    I read yesterday that Gowdy can actually stretch this out until 2016 if he wants. We'll see how it goes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. MickSeptember 19, 2014 at 8:39 AM

    Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-South Carolina, the chairman of the committee, "is leading a fair, fact-based and impartial investigation," Benghazi committee spokesman Jamal Ware said in a statement.



    
"Chairman Gowdy sincerely hopes that all sides will not prejudge the outcome of the investigation--before even the Committee's first hearing, which is on a topic suggested by the Democrats--and instead allow a constructive and thorough investigatory process that produces a final report on Benghazi that is beyond any doubt," Ware said.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownSeptember 19, 2014 at 12:03 PM



    During questioning on the first day of the Benghazi Committee Hearings, Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) brought up a seemingly minor detail about the Benghazi compound that could have huge implications for the State Department’s fault in the 2012 attack.

    In question was the designation of the embassy as a “Special Mission Compound.” Roskam asked Todd Keil, a member of the Independent Panel of Best Practices, what that term actually means. Keil stated:

    To be honest, from our review, Under Secretary Kennedy, in authorizing that, made up that term in order to avoid the OSPB security standards.

    Keil was referring to Patrick Kennedy, who is the Under Secretary for Management. Several bureaus, including the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, fall under his jurisdiction.

    The OSPB, or Overseas Security Policy Board, security standards are in place to carry out “the statutory security responsibilities prescribed by the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986.”

    They consist of “threat-indexed countermeasures (i.e., actions, devices, procedures, or techniques that reduce vulnerability),” according to State Department documents.

    In searching for other instances of “Special Mission Compounds,” Roskam said he and his staff found nothing – Benghazi alone had this designation.

    So if the category of the compound was changed to avoid important anti-terrorism security standards – as Keil confirmed – that mere word change could have drastic effects on how the crisis would be handled. Roskam continued:

    “What does it mean if something is said, ‘Well, we’re just going to declare this as something other than that which is to be regulated.’ That means you have no regulations, isn’t that right?”

    Keil’s brief response: “Correct, sir.”

    This minor detail of a designation change has major implications for the State Department’s responsibility. It furthers the idea that State Department leaders, including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, were either in over their heads, or that they were preemptively covering their tails should they fail to protect the compound and its inhabitants.

    http://www.ijreview.com/2014/09/179353-term-uncovered-benghazi-testimony-huge-implications-state-dept/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownSeptember 19, 2014 at 12:05 PM

      It should be very interesting when Mr. Patrick Kennedy testifies under oath.

      Delete
  5. UnknownSeptember 19, 2014 at 12:28 PM

    Witness Says Benghazi Files Were Withheld to Protect Hillary Clinton

    September 18, 2014 By Ernest Istook

    Hillary Clinton on the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi: “What difference at this point does it make?

    Another cover-up is being described by a State Department official who says key files were pulled out and not turned over to investigators about the Benghazi killings.

    A new claim details how the State Department allegedly concealed embarrassing documents about Benghazi.
    Benghazi, Libya, is where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed, despite numerous warnings about threats from Islamic terrorists.

    The special House investigation committee is about to begin hearings, which should include a State Department supervisor who says he witnessed the activity of sorting out embarrassing documents, removing them from the papers turned over to internal investigators. That might explain why that inquiry never even interviewed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    According to the witness, he was there when Clinton’s chief-of-staff presided over the effort to remove documents that would embarrass Clinton.

    Hopefully, the hearings will bring out the truth. It sounds like another sorry chapter in how government officials are abusing power to protect themselves, and keep the public either in the dark or totally misled.

    With insights, I’m Ernest Istook.

    http://www.tpnn.com/2014/09/18/witness-says-benghazi-files-were-withheld-to-protect-hillary-clinton/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownSeptember 19, 2014 at 12:30 PM

      It should be interesting when Ms. Clinton's chief-of-staff testifies under oath.

      Delete
  6. Max YasgurSeptember 19, 2014 at 5:11 PM

    You might as well post chunks of the phone book William. No matter how many tedious and useless FACTS you keep posting here, nothing is going to come of this. Republicans will continue to raise money and hopefully draw attention away from the fact they just decided to go back on vacation. This is a waste of time and tax payer money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownSeptember 19, 2014 at 6:41 PM

      Interesting that her husband was impeached and she may turn into the female "Nixon."

      What a dynamic historical duo.

      Delete
  7. rick0427September 19, 2014 at 6:39 PM

    Without this shit you simple can't beat her William.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownSeptember 19, 2014 at 6:45 PM

      It might be time for her to go home, wherever that is, bake cookies, and be grandma.

      Delete
    2. rick0427September 20, 2014 at 4:57 AM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  8. rick0427September 20, 2014 at 4:58 AM

    It might be but more likely it is time for our first woman President. Our first Grandma President.

    ReplyDelete
  9. KingstonSeptember 21, 2014 at 4:59 PM

    It is mid morning here as I sit at my desk and read through the accounts of events during the weekend. I see through the window a freshly planted tree has been damaged by the foraging kangaroo overnight, my wife will be mad when she finds this damage and no doubt I shall be required to do something fatal to the animal within the next day or so!. All this leads me into the posts above; my kangaroo damages a tree and will probably die as a result. William damages the reputation of someone who has done more for America than any woman since Janet Albright or Connie Rice. William of course receives no penalty and neither should he. What should accompany the freedom William has is the acceptance of a responsibility to allow the Star Chamber to dirty its hands in pursuit of political gain rather than the truth. It seems to me that William is likely to be found guilty by association if he continues to fan the smoldering embers of a fire with no fuel left to burn. Before I get hammered by the Rebubs here, I claim a lifelong allegiance to Conservative politics. I also claim to have an open mind not yet clouded by age or wall to wall propaganda.

    Cheers from Aussie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownSeptember 21, 2014 at 7:11 PM

      Ms. Clinton, and for that matter Billy, could not hold the jock strap of one Trey Gowdy. The facts will now drive the narrative. Of course it is a given that ric is a butt boy for every progressive since Wilson.

      As our latest progressive leads us into another conflict just as his fore fathers Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, and LBJ have before, we wallow in ever growing debt and dependency.

      The wife recently sprayed for America's most dangerous animal, the white tailed deer. Bow deer season starts in a few week in an effort to thin the herds who thrive on unkept semi rural lawns. Lawyers and former bankers now mow their own lawns thanks to our moribund over taxed situation.

      Basically king, here in Jersey we have no time for useful idiots. When you make a comment such as "no fuel left to burn," it displays your one sided superficial review. Mr. Gowdy is not running a kangaroo court.

      Delete
    2. rick0427September 21, 2014 at 8:42 PM

      No he's running a witch hunt.

      Delete
  10. UnknownSeptember 22, 2014 at 4:30 AM

    The Hillary Letters

    Hillary Clinton, Saul Alinsky correspondence revealed

    SHARE

    TWEET

    EMAIL

    Lee Balterman / The LIFE Picture Collection / Getty Images

          

    BY: Alana Goodman  
    September 21, 2014 10:00 pm

    NOTE: READ THE HILLARY CLINTON-SAUL ALINSKY LETTERS HERE

    Previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary Clinton and the late left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky reveal new details about her relationship with the controversial Chicago activist and shed light on her early ideological development.

    Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing.

    Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969, two letters obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

    The letters obtained by the Free Beacon are part of the archives for the Industrial Areas Foundation, a training center for community organizers founded by Alinsky, which are housed at the University of Texas at Austin.

    The letters also suggest that Alinsky, who died in 1972, had a deeper influence on Clinton’s early political views than previously known.

    A 23-year-old Hillary Clinton was living in Berkeley, California, in the summer of 1971. She was interning at the left-wing law firm Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, known for its radical politics and a client roster that included Black Panthers and other militants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownSeptember 22, 2014 at 4:31 AM

      On July 8, 1971, Clinton reached out to Alinsky, then 62, in a letter sent via airmail, paid for with stamps featuring Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and marked “Personal.”

      “Dear Saul,” she began. “When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?”

      “I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille [for Radicals] and need some new material to throw at people,” she added, a reference to Alinsky’s 1946 book on his theories of community organizing.

      Clinton devoted just one paragraph in her memoirLiving History to Alinsky, writing that she rejected a job offer from him in 1969 in favor of going to law school. She wrote that she wanted to follow a more conventional path.

      However, in the 1971 letter, Clinton assured Alinsky that she had “survived law school, slightly bruised, with my belief in and zest for organizing intact.”

      “The more I’ve seen of places like Yale Law School and the people who haunt them, the more convinced I am that we have the serious business and joy of much work ahead—if the commitment to a free and open society is ever going to mean more than eloquence and frustration,” wrote Clinton.

      According to the letter, Clinton and Alinsky had kept in touch since she entered Yale. The 62-year-old radical had reached out to give her advice on campus activism.

      “If I never thanked you for the encouraging words of last spring in the midst of the Yale-Cambodia madness, I do so now,” wrote Clinton, who had moderated a campus election to join an anti-war student strike.

      Delete
    2. UnknownSeptember 22, 2014 at 4:33 AM

      She added that she missed their regular conversations, and asked if Alinsky would be able to meet her the next time he was in California.

      “I am living in Berkeley and working in Oakland for the summer and would love to see you,” Clinton wrote. “Let me know if there is any chance of our getting together.”

      Clinton’s letter reached Alinsky’s office while he was on an extended trip to Southeast Asia, where was helping train community organizers in the Philippines.

      But a response letter from Alinsky’s secretary suggests that the radical organizer had a deep fondness for Clinton as well.

      “Since I know [Alinsky’s] feelings about you I took the liberty of opening your letter because I didn’t want something urgent to wait for two weeks,” Alinsky’s long-time secretary, Georgia Harper, wrote to Clinton in a July 13, 1971 letter. “And I’m glad I did.”

      Harper told Clinton that Alinksy’s book Rules for Radicals had been released. She enclosed several reviews of the book.

      “Mr. Alinsky will be in San Francisco, staying at the Hilton Inn at the airport on Monday and Tuesday, July 26 and 27,” Harper added. “I know he would like to have you call him so that if there is a chance in his schedule maybe you can get together.”

      Delete
    3. UnknownSeptember 22, 2014 at 4:34 AM

      It is unclear whether the meeting occurred.

      A self-proclaimed radical, Alinsky advocated guerilla tactics and civil disobedience to correct what he saw as an institutionalized power gap in poor communities. His philosophy divided the world into “haves”—middle class and wealthy people —and “have nots”—the poor. He took an ends-justify-the-means approach to power and wealth redistribution, and developed the theoretical basis of “community organizing.”

      “The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power,” wrote Alinsky in his 1971 book. “Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.”

      Clinton’s connection to Alinsky has been the subject of speculation for decades. It became controversial when Wellsley College, by request of the Clinton White House, sealed her 1968 thesis from the public for years.

      The paper was opened to the public in 2001. While the thesis is largely sympathetic to Alinsky, it is also critical of some of his tactics.

      Clinton described the organizer as “a man of exceptional charm,” but also objected to some of the conflicts he provoked as “unrealistic,” noting that his model could be difficult for others to replicate.

      “Many of the Alinsky-inspired poverty warriors could not (discounting political reasons) move beyond the cathartic first step of organizing groups ‘to oppose, complain, demonstrate, and boycott’ to developing and running a program,” she wrote.

      The letters obtained by the Free Beacon suggest that Clinton experimented more with radical politics during her law school years than she has publicly acknowledged.

      In Living History, she describes her views during that time as far more pragmatic than leftwing.

      She “agreed with some of Alinsky’s ideas,” Clinton wrote in her first memoir, but the two had a “fundamental disagreement” over his anti-establishment tactics.

      She described how this disagreement led to her parting ways with Alinsky in the summer before law school in 1969.

      “He offered me the chance to work with him when I graduated from college, and he was disappointed that I decided instead to go to law school,” she wrote.

      “Alinsky said I would be wasting my time, but my decision was an expression of my belief that the system could be changed from within.”

      A request for comment from the Clinton team was not returned

      Delete
    4. rick0427September 23, 2014 at 10:32 AM

      The Washington Free Beacon another highly conservative site. So what if Hilary was a friend of Saul Alinsky.

      Freedom works required reading for new members:

      "In 2009, FreedomWorks responded to the growing number of Tea party protests across the United States, and became one of several groups active in the "Tea Party" tax protests. Among other activities, FreedomWorks runs boot camps for supporters of Republican candidates. FreedomWorks spent over $10 million on the 2010 elections on campaign paraphernalia alone. The required reading list for new employees includes Saul Alinsky,Frédéric Bastiat and Ayn Rand.Rolling Stone and Talking Points Memo allege that FreedomWorks helps run the Tea Party Patriots. Tea Party Patriots denies this claim. According to a 2010 article in the New York Times, FreedomWorks "has done more than any other organization to build the Tea Party movement."

      End of that story. We are all the same eh William

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)