Saturday, August 30, 2014

Happy Labor Day - Judicial Watch: Fed Bulletin Describes Threat of Imminent Terrorist Attack on Southern Border

Judicial Watch: Feds’ Bulletin Describes Threat of Imminent Terrorist Attack on Southern Border

By Andrew C. McCarthy

August 29, 2014 1:47 PM

Comments

6900


For those of us who’ve been raising alarms about both the jihadist threat and the national-security vulnerability created by the Obama administration’s non-enforcement of the immigration laws, this is not a surprise — particularly less than two weeks before September 11. But it is nonetheless jarring to read. Judicial Watch has just put out thisstatement:

Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued.  Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat.

Specifically, Judicial Watch sources reveal that the militant group Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) is confirmed to now be operating in Juarez, a famously crime-infested narcotics hotbed situated across from El Paso, Texas. Violent crimes are so rampant in Juarez that the U.S. State Department has issued a number of travel warnings for anyone planning to go there. The last one was issued just a few days ago.

Intelligence officials have picked up radio talk and chatter indicating that the terrorist groups are going to “carry out an attack on the border,” according to one JW source.  “It’s coming very soon,” according to this high-level source, who clearly identified the groups planning the plots as “ISIS and Al Qaeda.” An attack is so imminent that the commanding general at Ft. Bliss, the U.S. Army post in El Paso, is being briefed, another source confirms. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to multiple inquiries from Judicial Watch, both telephonic and in writing, about this information.

The disturbing inside intelligence comes on the heels of news reports revealing that U.S. intelligence has picked up increased chatter among Islamist terror networks approaching the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. While these terrorists reportedly plan their attack just outside the U.S., President Obama admits that “we don’t have a strategy yet” to combat ISIS. “I don’t want to put the cart before the horse,” the commander-in-chief said this week during a White House press briefing. “I think what I’ve seen in some of the news reports suggest that folks are getting a little further ahead of what we’re at than what we currently are.”

The administration has also covered up, or at the very least downplayed, a serious epidemic of crime along the Mexican border even as heavily armed drug cartels have taken over portions of the region. Judicial Watch has reported that the U.S. Border Patrol actually ordered officers to avoid the most crime-infested stretches because they’re “too dangerous” and patrolling them could result in an “international incident” of cross border shooting. In the meantime, who could forget the famous words of Obama’s first Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano; the southern border is “as secure as it has ever been.”

These new revelations are bound to impact the current debate about the border crisis and immigration policy.

15 comments:

  1. Tell me it ain't so... well this is a surprise!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The president meanwhile, following performing his fundraising duties last evening, took time to soil his pants.

    Perhaps he can forego a couple of rounds of golf over the holiday weekend and develop a "strategy. "

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Strategy is to play 500 rounds of golf before he leaves office.

      He's behind.

      Delete
  3. The Department of Homeland Security quickly denied claims on Friday from a watchdog group that the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) has militants stationed in Juarez, Mexico who plan an 'imminent' attack against the United States.

    A DHS spokesman was bewildered, telling MailOnline that 'we are aware of absolutely nothing credible to substantiate this claim' made by Judicial Watch, a center-right group.

    'In Mexico?' the official said on the phone. 'I haven't seen that at all.'

    An hour before Judicial Watch's report surfaced, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said publicly that his agency and the FBI 'are unaware of any specific, credible threat to the U.S. homeland' from the terror network.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mick say it ain't so. Some right leaning group made something up?

      Delete
    2. hum they call that lying where I come from. SAY IT AIN'T SO!

      Delete
    3. Rick,
      Time will tell.

      With no southern border, who could possibly stop a terrorist attack originating from the southern border?

      Jsut asking.

      Delete
    4. Of course they are "unaware." Just like they were unaware of ISIS in Iraq, militants in Benghazi, Putin in the Crimea,,,,
      "I see nothing,,," Sergeant Schultz.

      Delete
    5. They call this administration habitual liars where I come from... and most everywhere else too!

      While this administration and the last kept poor immigration records we know from DEA statements that they only manage to seize some 20% of the drugs that come into the country... in 2009, they managed to seize some 2,980 metric tons (6.5million pounds) of pot.... lot of undetected mules carrying a lot of bulk that could just as well be... well just about anything.

      Now we have a dilemma here. If we say that this administration is a liar, then we must conclude that the DEA is creating a number that will keep themselves in work but if that is the case and the drug problem isn't as big as they say, then we have to suspect the claims of violence in central American countries being the cause of so many children fleeing the violence that they didn't stop running until they made it, not to the relative safety of the Mexican border where UNHCR would set up safe refugee camps but an additional 1600 miles to the U.S. border.

      Of course we could choose to disbelieve a Border patrol report that says that they have apprehended people from 73 different countries to include Pakistan, China, Somalia and Yemen.

      We could also neglect the Border Patrol discovery of hand grenades and a grenade launcher buried on the U.S. side of the border.

      I read the other day a post by a liberal that I thought was amusing. He said that he had long felt that Libertarians were "Some College" kind of people. I thought about that comment and concluded that he might be right because they still retain the common sense they were born with and not had it bled from them by spending to much time in liberal circles....

      Delete
  4. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2738113/ISIS-Mexico-Feds-DENY-watchdog-group-s-claim-terror-group-operating-Juarez-plans-imminent-car-bomb-attacks-US-targets.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Feds would deny? Tell me isn't so, they wouldn't lie.

      If you like your doctor you can keep him.
      If you like your insurance you can keep it.

      Delete
  5. FEDS TO ADVERTISE SETTLEMENT ALLOWING DEPORTED ILLEGALS TO RETURN

    4888

    14

    687

    by TONY LEE 28 Aug 2014 1123POST A COMMENT

    As part of a legal settlement that will allow some illegal immigrants who deported themselves from Southern California to return to the United States, the federal government has agreed to advertise the settlement on various Mexican and Spanish-language media outlets.

    The ACLU filed a class-action lawsuit last year on behalf of eleven illegal immigrants who deported themselves. The settlement reached on Wednesday will only cover "longtime California residents with relatives who are U.S. citizens and... young migrants whose parents brought them into the country illegally" who deported themselves between 2009 and 2013. An ACLU official has indicated that there were nearly 250,000 people who were "deported voluntarily from Southern California between 2009 and 2013" and estimated to the Los Angeles Times that the "number of repatriations could reach into the hundreds or thousands."

    The U.S. government, through ad buys online, in print, on billboards, and on radio stations, will hope to reach "friends and family of the affected class" in Southern California and Mexico. According to the settlement, the federal government will advertise on television channels like Univision, ESPN Deportes, MundoFox, El Universal, and the Univision Deportes Network. They will also partner with People en Espanol and even the Mexico National Football Team in addition to placing billboards "in high population Mexican border cities of Tijuana, Tecate and Mexicali, as well as focusing placements near border crossings."

    U.S. officials will also place "radio ads :60 in length... on top Spanish speaking radio stations near the Mexico/U.S. border." Those who search for "Lopez Case," "Lopez Class Action," "Voluntary Return to Mexico," "Rights for Detainees," "Detained by ICE," and "Returned to Mexico by ICE" will also be targeted with information about the settlement.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Not included in Judicial Watch’s analysis, but clearly germane to it, is Rep. Peter King’s harsh criticism of President Obama’s disastrous decision to wear a tan suit yesterday:


    “There’s no way any of us can excuse what the president did yesterday. When you have the world watching. When you a week, two weeks of anticipation of what the United States is gonna do. For him to walk out, I’m not trying to be trivial here. In a light suit, light tan suit saying that first he wants to talk about what most Americans care about the revision of second quarter numbers on the economy. This is a week after Jim Foley was beheaded and he’s trying to act like real Americans care about the economy not about ISIS and not about terrorism. And then he goes on to say he has no strategy [...]

    To me it was just a terrible performance by a commander in chief, and forget that our allies are watching, forget that the American people are watching. ISIS is watching. If you were the head of ISIS, if you were Baghdadi or if you were anyone in the ISIS leadership, would you come away from yesterday afraid of the United States? Would you be afraid that the United States is going to use all its power to crush ISIS? Or would you think, here’s a person who’s going to go out and do a few fundraisers over the Labor Day weekend?

    The tan suit was actually a white flag, America, and ISIS is already mobilizing to kill us all!

    Please panic responsibly this weekend, and be careful not to mix your paranoias.

    Read more at http://wonkette.com/558793/wingnuts-pretty-sure-isis-gonna-storm-texas-any-minute-now#mcZ3sLB2pYlmKezX.99

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry,I posted in the wrong thread. See the Presidents suit for the correct posting.

    ReplyDelete