CHATTANOOGA -- The United Auto Workers will "look into other options" to get recognized at the Chattanooga Volkswagen plant after dropping its challenge Monday to an election it narrowly lost in February, said Gary Casteel, the UAW's district director.
The union abruptly ended its objection to the vote just before a hearing before a National Labor Relations Board judge was to begin in Chattanooga to consider the challenge.
Related: UAW withdraws VW union vote appeal
"There are still options other than elections and card checks, and we can prove we had a majority" of workers favoring UAW representation "prior to the election," Casteel said. "And we came up just 44 votes short of winning."
Hourly workers voted 712-626 against joining the UAW in the Feb. 12-14 election, which the union subsequently challenged claiming unfair outside influence from anti-union groups and Republican politicians, including U.S. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Gov. Bill Haslam.
Although the union has an agreement with Volkswagen that it won't call another election through the NLRB for at least a year, Casteel said Volkswagen could agree to a private election and choose to accept the UAW on its own.
"The board doesn't have to certify anything," he said. "Volkswagen could give us voluntary recognition. There is no adversarial relationship between the UAW and Volkswagen, and we're still having discussions."
But Casteel also said he doesn't believe "it's in anybody's best interest to try another election anytime soon."
Social media: Reaction to UAW decision
The focus now should be on getting the state to approve a tax-incentive plan to allow Volkswagen to put production of a new SUV at the Chattanooga plant, something that had been on hold while the union was trying to get the election voided and a new vote ordered.
"The ball is in the state's court now," Casteel said. "Those employees deserve a new product, and the plant needs it."
Casteel said the union decided to drop its appeal because it felt it was "unfair to keep Volkswagen mired down in the appeals process, which could take years to complete."
He cited a recent NLRB decision in a North Carolina case in which the union had cited unfair activities in an election it lost.
"We won the right to have a new election, but it took six years," he said.
"Our next step is to call on the state to give VW the incentives," Casteel said. "We want to see the new SUV in the Chattanooga plant. This is not a ploy to set up another election."
Opponents to the UAW's Chattanooga organizing drive said they aren't backing off on their efforts to keep the union out.
As for the union dropping the appeal, "This was good news," said Matt Patterson, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Worker Freedom, which had taken a lead role in fighting the UAW's challenge to the election.
"But everyone should recognize that the union is not going to go back to Detroit with its tail tucked between its legs," Patterson said. "Assuming that Volkswagen doesn't find a way to get them in there anyway, the union will try again as soon as it legally and possibly can."
UAW President Bob King has said that organizing at least some of the foreign-transplant auto plants in the South is vital to the survival of the union, and Volkswagen had appeared to be the easiest target because the union had the cooperation of Volkswagen's German management.
The union also is trying to organize at Nissan plants in Tennessee and Mississippi, and a Mercedes-Benz plant in Alabama – although both of those automakers have resisted the UAW's attempts, which have so far been unsuccessful.
The union abruptly ended its objection to the vote just before a hearing before a National Labor Relations Board judge was to begin in Chattanooga to consider the challenge.
Related: UAW withdraws VW union vote appeal
"There are still options other than elections and card checks, and we can prove we had a majority" of workers favoring UAW representation "prior to the election," Casteel said. "And we came up just 44 votes short of winning."
Hourly workers voted 712-626 against joining the UAW in the Feb. 12-14 election, which the union subsequently challenged claiming unfair outside influence from anti-union groups and Republican politicians, including U.S. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Gov. Bill Haslam.
Although the union has an agreement with Volkswagen that it won't call another election through the NLRB for at least a year, Casteel said Volkswagen could agree to a private election and choose to accept the UAW on its own.
"The board doesn't have to certify anything," he said. "Volkswagen could give us voluntary recognition. There is no adversarial relationship between the UAW and Volkswagen, and we're still having discussions."
But Casteel also said he doesn't believe "it's in anybody's best interest to try another election anytime soon."
Social media: Reaction to UAW decision
The focus now should be on getting the state to approve a tax-incentive plan to allow Volkswagen to put production of a new SUV at the Chattanooga plant, something that had been on hold while the union was trying to get the election voided and a new vote ordered.
"The ball is in the state's court now," Casteel said. "Those employees deserve a new product, and the plant needs it."
Casteel said the union decided to drop its appeal because it felt it was "unfair to keep Volkswagen mired down in the appeals process, which could take years to complete."
He cited a recent NLRB decision in a North Carolina case in which the union had cited unfair activities in an election it lost.
"We won the right to have a new election, but it took six years," he said.
"Our next step is to call on the state to give VW the incentives," Casteel said. "We want to see the new SUV in the Chattanooga plant. This is not a ploy to set up another election."
Opponents to the UAW's Chattanooga organizing drive said they aren't backing off on their efforts to keep the union out.
As for the union dropping the appeal, "This was good news," said Matt Patterson, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Worker Freedom, which had taken a lead role in fighting the UAW's challenge to the election.
"But everyone should recognize that the union is not going to go back to Detroit with its tail tucked between its legs," Patterson said. "Assuming that Volkswagen doesn't find a way to get them in there anyway, the union will try again as soon as it legally and possibly can."
UAW President Bob King has said that organizing at least some of the foreign-transplant auto plants in the South is vital to the survival of the union, and Volkswagen had appeared to be the easiest target because the union had the cooperation of Volkswagen's German management.
The union also is trying to organize at Nissan plants in Tennessee and Mississippi, and a Mercedes-Benz plant in Alabama – although both of those automakers have resisted the UAW's attempts, which have so far been unsuccessful.
VW model is one where there's a relatively cooperative relationship between management and labor. UAW is anything but cooperative.
ReplyDeleteInteresting times. Wait until the UAW gives them the GM treatment with a long term strike. Higher wages, better benefits. Should be interesting to see the response from VW.
DeleteOne would think that after totally trashing GM, Chysler, Ford got lucky, the morons from VW, Mercedes, Nissan should read a little about the relationship the union has with the companies.
But in the end, like the government it's all about collecting as much money as possible for their pet projects.
UAW membership has declined from 3.4 mil in it's glory days to less than .5 mil. Who's going to fund the pensions of the retirees? Most VW production workers could do the math, and were savvy enough to realize that they'd be the ones doing the bailout. And the UAW can't really top VW's compensation package.
DeleteAnd they want how many hours of my pay for what?/
DeleteHow have you been, Flair!
ReplyDeleteLooks like VW gets to live in Tennessee another day.
Getting settled into the great state of Tennessee my friend. Guess where I'm working?
DeleteNo state tax is an added bonus! Sounds like a good move. All the best.
DeleteFirst Welcome Ric to the site. It's been a while my friend. I read about this some time ago and we had another post concerning this issue. It was my understanding that VW was open to unionization because well, in Germany it is a heavily unionized company. I guess my first question would be, how does the union benefit it's workers in a right to work state such as Tennessee et al southern states. It may be like it here in NC only a collective bargaining agreement. For example the teachers here are not really considered in a "Union" per se but a State Teachers Association that handles all worker issues. Other then collecting dues does a union really have the teeth in the south as it does the north? And by the way ya'll I am totally indifferent on unions. I had one Union job in my life and really didn't gain or lose in the experience.
ReplyDeleteThank you my friend. You're right about VW management not only being open to unionization, but being the driver of it. That's why UAW got so giddy.
DeleteVW business model uses work councils where labor, management, and white collar have a say in the day to day operations. But US Labor law requires a trade union which is the reason for approaching UAW.
In this type of agreement UAW would have its wings clipped and only be able to negotiate hours and pay. All else would go through the work council.
Workers did not object to that. It was the UAW they didn't trust. Can ya blame em?
One other issue here that I don't agree with. Conservatives want less government control but cheer the governor and Senator for blocking this challenge to VW. A union that the company seemingly has no problem with.
ReplyDeleteWhat the NLRB?
DeleteWho cares what the company wants, it what the people want and it's mot the union. The company doesn't pay the dues, the people do. Why should the union have unfettered access to sell their case and no one else can say a word?
Deleteid time working in a union atmosphere, they brought nothing to the table cost 4 hours pay a week. No thanks.
UAW had unfettered access to VW workers. Obama had no problem making his threats.
DeleteIn a democracy I don't see a problem with everybody being able to voice their opinions, do you my friend?
But the NLRB rules state the union can do and say pretty much what they want to say and the company has no right to dispute what the union says. Another screwed up law.
DeleteGood to hear from you. How's the market treating you/
I'm out of the rigged Stock markets for now and into real estate which is also rigged but at least I know some refs in that game. How about you?
DeleteI have done quite well in the market. Have been taking profits for the last year. Sell half a position, keep the other half. At a 50/50 cash-stock ratio. In the next few months that's likely to dwindle down a bit further.
DeleteTried the real estate thing, hated being a slum lord, had 4 rentals, sold all 4 after 2 years. To much government (local) intervention. Bought 2 houses fixed and flipped them. Made a few bucks but a pain.
Closed the business as I got tired of the government (EPA) stepping into every project. Found the people working for me work so I'm on sabbatical until 2016. Should the business climate change, I'll go back to work, if not, may do an early retirement.