By Allie Grasgreen
President Barack Obama will need the approval of Congress to
realize his proposal for making two years of community college free for
students.
So far, that plan doesn’t have an official price tag — other
than “significant,” according to White House officials. If all 50 states
participate, the proposal could benefit 9 million students each year and save
students an average of $3,800 in tuition, the White House said.
But administration officials insisted on a call with
reporters Thursday evening that “this is a proposal with bipartisan appeal.”
Case in point: Republican Gov. Bill Haslam, whose brainchild
Tennessee Promise program strongly influenced Obama’s proposal. Beginning this
year, any high school graduate in that state is eligible for two years of free
community college tuition under the Tennessee Promise.
Obama, alongside Vice President Joe Biden and second lady
Jill Biden, will tout his proposal dubbed “America’s College Promise” during a
visit Pellissippi Community College in Knoxville, Tenn., on Friday.
“What I’d like to do is to see the first two years of
community college free for everybody who’s willing to work for it,” Obama said
in a White House video posted Thursday evening. “It’s something we can
accomplish, and it’s something that will train our workforce so that we can
compete with anybody in the world.”
The president’s proposal would make two years of community
college free for students of any age with a C+ average who attend school at
least half-time and who are making “steady progress” toward their degree.
To be eligible, community colleges would have to offer
academic programs that fully transfer credits to local public four-year
colleges and universities or training programs with high graduation rates that
lead to in-demand degrees and certificates. Community colleges must also adopt
“promising and evidence-based institutional reforms” to improve student
outcomes.
Scotts comments: Noet the additional requirement to reform the school beyond providing
accredited instruction to some bureaucrat’s notion of 'improved'. Promoting the General Welfare never looked so controlling....
Federal funding would cover three-quarters of the average
cost of community college, and Obama is asking states to pick up the rest of
the tab — assuming Congress agrees to the plan in the first place.
“I hope we’ve got the chance to make sure that Congress gets
behind these kinds of efforts to make sure that even as we rebound and grow in
2015, that it benefits everybody and not just some,” the president said in the
video.
Obama said his online announcement was “a little preview” of
his plans for the Jan. 20 State of the Union address. The cost details will be
in the president’s 2016 budget proposal, White House director Cecilia Muñoz
said.
Muñoz said Obama aims to make college “the norm in the same
way high school is the norm now.”
The Tennessee Promise idea has, needless to say, caught on.
And Education Undersecretary Ted Mitchell said on Thursday’s call that he hopes
Obama’s plan will encourage more states to start similar programs.
But the idea is not without critics.
The Institute for College Access and Success, which is
typically in step with the Obama administration, called the proposal “a wolf in
sheep’s clothing.” Among the problems, TICAS says, is that the more substantial
costs of college — living expenses, textbooks and transportation — are
typically left out of the deal.
And Bryce McKibben, a former Association of Community
College Trustees policy analyst who recently became a policy adviser to
Democrats on the Senate education committee, has noted potential flaws. For instance,
the program could end up doing more for less needy students than those who need
it the most, because low-income applicants may already be covered by Pell
grants and other federal aid.
Since state appropriations plummeted during the economic
recession, students and families have been forced to pay more for college. From
2008-12, public college funding in 26 states fell by 5 percent or more,
according to a recent Center for American Progress report.
Advocacy groups including CAP, which has counseled the Obama
administration on higher education issues, have promoted ideas to spur both
federal and state funding to boost college enrollment.
“The first order of business is to make college more
affordable — and by affordable, we mean basically make it free for low- and
moderate-income families through federal investments and stimulating state
investments,” David Bergeron, vice president of postsecondary education at CAP,
told POLITICO earlier this week.
At the same time, Bergeron had some reservations about
Friday’s announcement.
“I don’t want to just have our low-income and least prepared
students going to community colleges,” he said, “because those community
colleges are the least resourced.”
But Thomas J. Snyder, president of the massive Ivy Tech Community
College in Indiana, says he fully supports the idea, which he called “a
game-changer.”
“We have ground to make up against other countries, and this
is a big first step in doing just that,” Snyder said in an email. “It will make
the goal of achieving a college degree more attainable for more Americans —
whether it be a two-year degree that leads to a good-paying job or the first
step toward a more affordable four-year option.”
Haslam and Sen. Lamar Alexander will both be on hand at
Friday’s event. Alexander plugged the Tennessee Promise on the Senate floor
Wednesday. But the newly elected Senate education committee chair also said
that simplifying the federal financial aid process is “the one thing the
federal government can do to give more opportunity to Americans, particularly
in community colleges.”
Also Friday, Obama plans to announce the new American
Technical Training Fund to “expand innovating, high-quality technical training
programs across the country,” according to a White House release. The program
will award programs that partner with employers and include “work-based
learning opportunities,” provide accelerated training and accommodate part-time
work.
The president has some limited authority to steer Department
of Labor funds toward skills training that focuses on partnerships with
employers and accelerated training. But a larger investment would need to be
authorized by Congress, and in recent years both chambers have more or less
ignored Obama’s proposals for investments in jobs-driven training, such as a
2015 budget proposal for a $1.5 billion “Community College Job-Driven Training
Fund” that went nowhere.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/barack-obama-free-community-college-114094.html#ixzz3OJVLJERt
This is the second
big policy that Obama has tried to shove down the national throat because some
state has decided to give it a try and because they were Republican states… the
effort becomes bipartisan. These kinds
of ideas are exactly why states were always supposed to have the autonomy to do
things their own way. New ideas are
tried and rejected or other states see the merit and adopt the idea
themselves. By picking which ideas to
use and forcing it at the national level the creativity from which these
original ideas spring is killed.
As with Obamacare,
proponents took from the Massachusetts initiative and because it was a
republican, it became bipartisan. People
in Massachusetts have given the program mixed reviews as it has evolved… it is
not a completed or perfected product and even if it was, another state may
implement the general idea, in order to keep and attract new business and
residents, with a completely different approach which Massachusetts may choose
to adopt at a later date.
Besides… rather than
having the federal government screw up the community college system as they have public education, perhaps they
should leave well enough alone.
Makes me feel like a fool paying for my bachelors degree all by myself. Where can I get in line for "free" stuff?
ReplyDeleteAin't socialism just grand.
DeleteMore Free Stuff!
18T and counting.
Might be the cheap way out . the 42% takers are probably individually costing you more then 3800 a year. Teach them a skill and maybe you can quit keeping them for years.
DeleteNothing done at the federal level is ever cheap (as in well designed and managed) and rarely efficient. You can believe that their will be unintended concequences like the killing of the peel grant system that is focused purely on poorer students and of course just as with student loans, the cost of community colleges will rise, harming those who need to upgrade skills on a tight family budget.
Delete