Wednesday, January 21, 2015

A sensible solution to gun control for Kingston.

Sensible Gun Control

The answer has been right in front of us all the time.......

In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the US.

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the US who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the US.

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the US.

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the US.

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office in Jacksonville, FL.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.


That is a very meaningful list. You MUST get the point, even if the media does not.

Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns. Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative were involved in these shootings and murders.

SOLUTION: "It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns."

3 comments:

  1. William as always my thanks, it is a pleasure to have a teacher of my favorite subject who can provide such unbiased instruction!.
    Having seen your post but some three minutes ago, I would need to research a little before offering some rebuttal. However, just for the moment, consider the root cause of all the problems and argument concerning gun laws in your country.
    Think of Madison joint founder of the Democratic Republican party in association with Jefferson. Jefferson authored the Declaration of Independence and Madison authored the Bill of Rights and was responsible for a large chunk of the constitution.
    Bearing the above in mind, perhaps the conclusion could be drawn that Americans of whatever political creed should not be permitted to own guns!. In your history as a nation no less than four Presidents have been shot and killed while in office. Not necessarily in order they were Lincoln,McKinley,Garfield and JFK. A proud record William and as long as proponents of “Freedom” continue to talk out of their fundamental orifice, there will be no change
    Cheers from Aussie.
    By the way, since our gun laws were tightened there has been a very dramatic drop in gun related deaths. Unfortunately there has been an increase in death caused by stabbing. Figures are still miniscule compared to the US but any violent death is inexcusable other than lawful execution in certain circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey William, extend that to both parties and you might have something. Include the Libertarians and other independents too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. William you're an idiot. People of all political stripes murder rob and especially cheat. We can start listing all the repubs who have busted the law but what does that prove?

    ReplyDelete