Thursday, May 9, 2013

The mass exodus of Christians from the Muslim world


A mass exodus of Christians is currently underway.  Millions of Christians are being displaced from one end of the Islamic world to the other. 
We are reliving the true history of how the Islamic world, much of which prior to the Islamic conquests was almost entirely Christian, came into being.
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom recently said: “The flight of Christians out of the region is unprecedented and it’s increasing year by year.”  In our lifetime alone “Christians might disappear altogether from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Egypt.”
Ongoing reports from the Islamic world certainly support this conclusion:  Iraq was the earliest indicator of the fate awaiting Christians once Islamic forces are liberated from the grip of dictators.  
The 2010 Baghdad church attack, which saw nearly 60 Christian worshippers slaughtered, is the tip of a decade-long iceberg.
In 2003, Iraq’s Christian population was at least one million. Today fewer than 400,000 remain—the result of an anti-Christian campaign that began with the U.S. occupation of Iraq, when countless Christian churches were bombed and countless Christians killed, including by crucifixion and beheading.  
The 2010 Baghdad church attack, which saw nearly 60 Christian worshippers slaughtered, is the tip of a decade-long iceberg.
Now, as the U.S. supports the jihad on Syria’s secular president Assad, the same pattern has come to Syria: entire regions and towns where Christians lived for centuries before Islam came into being have now been emptied, as the opposition targets Christians for kidnapping, plundering, and beheadings, all in compliance with mosque calls telling the populace that it’s a “sacred duty” to drive Christians away.
In October 2012 the last Christian in the city of Homs—which had a Christian population of some 80,000 before jihadis came—was murdered.  One teenage Syrian girl said: “We left because they were trying to kill us… because we were Christians….  Those who were our neighbors turned against us. At the end, when we ran away, we went through balconies. We did not even dare go out on the street in front of our house.”
In Egypt, some 100,000 Christian Copts have fled their homeland soon after the “Arab Spring.”  In September 2012, the Sinai’s small Christian community was attacked and evicted by Al Qaeda linked Muslims, Reuters reported. But even before that, the Coptic Orthodox Church lamented the “repeated incidents of displacement of Copts from their homes, whether by force or threat.
Displacements began in Ameriya [62 Christian families evicted], then they stretched to Dahshur [120 Christian families evicted], and today terror and threats have reached the hearts and souls of our Coptic children in Sinai.”
Iraq, Syria, and Egypt are part of the Arab world.  But even in “black” African and “white” European nations with Muslim majorities, Christians are fleeing.
In Mali, after a 2012 Islamic coup, as many as 200,000 Christians fled.  According to reports, “the church in Mali faces being eradicated,” especially in the north “where rebels want to establish an independent Islamist state and drive Christians out… there have been house to house searches for Christians who might be in hiding, churches and other Christian property have been looted or destroyed, and people tortured into revealing any Christian relatives.” At least one pastor was beheaded.
Even in European Bosnia, Christians are leaving en mass “amid mounting discrimination and Islamization.”  Only 440,000 Catholics remain in the Balkan nation, half the prewar figure.  
Problems cited are typical:  “while dozens of mosques were built in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo, no building permissions [permits] were given for Christian churches.” “Time is running out as there is a worrisome rise in radicalism,” said one authority, who further added that the people of Bosnia-Herzegovina were “persecuted for centuries” after European powers “failed to support them in their struggle against the Ottoman Empire.”
And so history repeats itself. 
One can go on and on: 
To anyone following the plight of Christians under Islamic persecution, none of this is surprising.  As I document in my new book, “Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians,” all around the Islamic world—in nations that do not share the same race, language, culture, or economics, in nations that share only Islam—Christians are being persecuted into extinction. Such is the true face of extremist Islamic resurgence.

19 comments:

  1. Is this article relevant it today's world.... yes.

    It is quite interesting Angie that you would post it after a pro regulatory statement like this:

    Do we regulate morals... yes.....
    should we..... a God fearing person might argue yes..
    Constitutionally ......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How is it relevant? Whenever a simple question is asked of Angie such as, "What are we supposed to do about it?" there is never an answer. To post such a thing and never start a discussion is very close to propaganda.

      Delete
    2. Scott:
      After Constitutionally I should have included a "?"

      Trust me when I say that I do lean towards the libertarian side and understand the dangers of deviation from it. Yet I do believe that there are some things that are understood. The fact that during WWII Japanese were interned into camps was unconstitutional yet I will go to my grave believing that it was the right thing to do. I also believe that having perpetual standing armed forces are necessary in today world yet not allowed under strict interpretation of our constitution. This is why it is so important to have decent elected officials in office and involved in all three branches of our government and at the state level.

      I also would state that for obvious reasons that adhering to Judeo-Christians values was what has made this country great. Turing away from those values and ignoring them is our downfall. You may be buddhist, atheist or even a Luciferian but those values will not benefit a society as the Judeo-Christian's.

      Keep in mind that we all have the right to believe anyway we want to ---- and even God allows for us to choose between Heaven or Hell.

      Delete
    3. Max;
      You add nothing to this discussion - as usual.

      Delete
    4. Angie:
      "Keep in mind that we all have the right to believe anyway we want to ---- and even God allows for us to choose between Heaven or Hell."

      Of coarse we have the right to our own opinions... atleast until the government figures out a way to monitor and give them to us. In that regard we have the right to translate that opinion into civic action and votes. Unfortunately the vast majority of people in the US vote with little real understanding of who or why they vote the way they do. I come to forums such as this to understand those opinions and hopefully broaden my view of things that effect all of us. I find that many times I do not clearly understand why I feel the way I do or find that the information that formed my views was flawed. Too many discussions on these forums end abruptly because people asked to justify their opinion either can't or won't and rarely do you see someone admit that perhaps they have it wrong.... but such is the way of the political bias that shapes our rather polarized nation.

      Delete
  2. It is quite sad that in today's World, that anyone is prosecuted for their religious views, or subjected to someone else's. We should cut off relations with any nation that doesn't protect religious freedom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian;
      I agree. I would also add countries that perpetuate slave labor but instead we allow them to put our companies out of business and set industry standards with regards to labor.

      Globalization has been a failure from the standpoint of American ideals yet a victory for tyrants.

      Delete
    2. "Globalization has been a failure from the standpoint of American ideals yet a victory for tyrants. "

      Likely, you don't see irony in this statement.

      To your statement Brian, do you really believe we can and should just cut off relations with any nation that doesn't protect religious freedom? Is being a leader for freedom simply a matter of shunning everyone we don't agree with?

      Delete
    3. Yes. Countries that force upon their citizens Sharia law, or communist countries like China that prosecute any religion should not have formal relations with the U.S.

      Delete
    4. Yeah, I shouldn't have bothered asking a rhetorical question I already knew the answer to. If we followed your ideal here, there would never be a time we were not at war with someone and we would inevitably be aggressors who just went and took things away from others simply because we need them.

      Delete
    5. I never mentioned war! China has a horrible human rights record, including religious rights and we do tons of business with them and will not even talk to Cuba. What a double standard that is. I fear Chinese or Muslim aggression much more than Castro's ragtag group of "freedom fighters".
      Even as we speak, your guy, Obama is threatening to deport a German family (who is here legally under asylum) for wanting to home school their children. Who is the evil one now?

      Delete
    6. Brian, Obama is always the evil one in your eyes, yawn. When it comes to the double standard and not talking to Cuba, I can't agree with you more wholeheartedly. And for that matter, I can't remotely disagree with you on China or with respect to countries that practice Sharia. But ask yourself why we talk to those countries and why we trade with them. It's because they have something we need. The offshoring of jobs to China was done solely in the name of Capitalism and we maintain relations with the back stabbing Saudi's because of oil.

      You don't mention war, of course, but it's the reality to what you are proposing.

      Delete
    7. Max
      Gotta suggests the US should cut off relations with countries not supporting religious freedom. You then immediately state "..there would never be a time we were not at war with someone and we would inevitably be the aggressors..."
      How does cutting off relations constitute being at war?

      Delete
    8. Good catch Terri. Max muddies the water and manipulates statements to interject his beliefs - the useful idiot he is....

      Delete
    9. Mike,
      Saudi Arabia is the breeding ground for Muslim terrorism. Your President is blocking the Keystone pipeline, blocking new drilling offshore, and has put fracking for other hydrocarbons on hold. The only reason domestic petroleum production has increased and imports have decreased is because of the Obama depression on demand and utilization of private lands for exploration.

      If we "drill, baby, drill" we could tell the Saudi's to go jump off a cliff and take their wassibism with them. If we encouraged business growth instead of tax the rich and mind numbing pages of regulation, we could regain our brutal control over China

      Delete
  3. In defence of Max's statement, we have no diplomatic relations with exactly 4 countries (5 actually but one is a technicality - Bhutan we have diplomatic ties threw our embassy in New Delhi) Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Taiwan. Why do you suppose Taiwan is on that list? We have a treaty to defend the island... we sell it arms... we trade with them, but we will not defy China by calling it an independent country... It is either because of Capitalism or the potential of war... Were we to cut diplomatic ties with China, we would be on very hostile footing indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. China is not our friend. I prefer the Founders vision of not entangling ourselves with any other country unless we are attacked or strongly provoked. Diplomatic engagements are for dialogue, not intimidation or war mongering. I also think that "free trade" has become a misnomer, and any trade agreements should be labeled fair trade. Anything that we cannot mine, farm, or manufacture should have severe duties attached to keep countries like China from dumping subsidized slave labor onto our shores.

      Delete
    2. It is not about cutting ties it was the wrong in ever forming those ties to begin with. Our enemies have become not just our trading partners but our only viable suppliers and lenders. This was a huge mistake but was purposely done. We should had nothing to do with them in the first place. Instead we finance their growth through consumer dependence. The costs to the USA may prove to be a cost too high to recover from.

      Delete
  4. "I prefer the Founders vision of not entangling ourselves with any other country unless we are attacked or strongly provoked."

    "It is not about cutting ties it was the wrong in ever forming those ties to begin with."

    I'm not disagreeing with either of you. But the historical situation that we are in right now is that we have peace treaties, trade treaties and defence treaties with everyone who is not a sworn enemy... Untangling that long history would, without question, create conflicts and put us at odds with lots of different countries... That's just a fact. As far as governments who do not support religious freedom one must look in the mirror and decide if that is not becoming the case in our own country....

    ReplyDelete