This is from usdeception.com:
Fellow Patriot, this will demolish your 2014:
A chilling conspiracy will wipe out 281 million Americans in the next 6 months.
The media has sworn a blood oath to keep it hushed.
But you deserve to know the truth because in this treasonous agenda, you and your loved ones are the sacrificial lambs.
That's why in this short presentation, I'm going to blow the lid off this twisted plot that has shocked even hardcore liberals because knowing this secret information will decide who will survive and who will perish when the sinister plot unravels.
You'll discover the real secret reason why the US economy hasn't "collapsed" yet, and EXACTLY WHEN the dollar will turn into dust and our streets into hell.
And if you stick with me till the end, I'll also share with you the story of how a penniless, crippled senior not only survived but prospered through a 4 year economic Armegeddon (you will be SHOCKED when you see why others were BEGGING him to take their gold).
And even though this might sound impossible now, once you read this presentation and do what it says you'll discover exactly what to do to ensure that your loved ones are spoiled with more than enough food, water and medical supplies when chaos reigns...even though hungry mobs are roaming the streets, or breaking into homes...desperately looking for food.
While the unprepared masses will see their guns taken away from them and their families shipped to a FEMA camp you'll not only escape the terrible fate of most Americans but will be a hero to your family and even to the entire neighborhood no matter how unprepared you may think you are now and no matter if you think you're too old, or too weak to prepare.
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Woman Celebrates Her Cool Abortion
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
May 6, 2014
Infowars.com
May 6, 2014
A counselor at a New Jersey abortion clinic celebrated her own abortion by posting it on YouTube in order to treasure her “special memory”.
Emily Letts recorded the lead up to the procedure and some of the abortion itself as part of an effort to inspire women who may feel guilty or scared about terminating their pregnancies.
Writing about the experience in a Cosmopolitan piece, Letts admits that her failure to use protection during sex was “crazy” given her role as an abortion advisor, illustrating how many women treat abortion as merely another form of birth control.
“Once I caught my breath, I knew immediately I was going to have an abortion. I knew I wasn’t ready to take care of a child. The guy wasn’t involved in my decision,” she writes.
Letts describes her role of encouraging women to terminate their pregnancies as a “perfect world that fulfills me in so many different ways”.
As the abortion procedure began, Letts wore a beaming smile and even let out a giggle as she stated, “I’m a lucky girl”. In her article she writes of how she was “feeling the love from everyone in the room” during the abortion, which she described as, “like I was giving birth”.
Letts can he heard humming during the abortion. When the procedure is over she remarks, “Cool. I feel good.”
Letts says the whole experience, “will always be a special memory for me,” adding that she kept the sonogram of the baby as a memento.
Although Letts says that upon posting her video people were, “breathtakingly supportive,” that sentiment quickly seems to be evaporating, with her YouTube video receiving over 1300 thumbs down. Comments on the video have been disabled, suggesting Letts was hit by a barrage of criticism after conservative media outlets picked up the story.
Leftist outfit Think Progress hailed Letts’ decision to make her story public, claiming that it removed some of the stigma surrounding abortion.
This story underscores the worst aspect of abortion advocates which is the fact that many of them celebrate killing babies as if it’s an ‘empowering’ and ‘positive’ procedure. Is it too much to ask for them to at the very least be somber and regretful? Letts truly deserves whatever onslaught of public condemnation is heading her way.
In March we reported on a similar example of bad taste involving the D.C. Abortion Fund (DCAF), an organization that helps poor women pay for abortions, which caused controversy by offering a ‘coat hanger’ pendant to contributors who donate $10 or more a month for women in Washington D.C., Maryland, and Virginia to terminate their pregnancies.
In 2004, abortion advocate and author Jennifer Baumgardner launched the “I Had an Abortion” project in order to encourage women who had terminated pregnancies to embrace their decision. In a promotional stunt for the campaign, feminist Gloria Steinem wore a t-shirt which read, “I had an abortion” while adopting a smiling, celebratory pose.

Last year footage also emerged of abortion advocates chanting “Hail Satan” in unison at the Texas State Capitol building.
In February 2012, a was paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics which argued that abortion should be extended to make the killing of newborn babies permissible.
Killing babies is obviously not good enough for abortion advocates. The whole sordid procedure has to be sanctified as some kind of joyous ceremony. Even if you support a women’s right to abortion, the process should be solemn and as dignified as possible, it shouldn’t be couched in terms such as “cool,” “lucky,” or “special”.
By characterizing abortion in this context, the left exposes the reason for its advocacy of a woman’s “right to choose” not so much as a cherished freedom but as some kind of sick bloodlust for celebrating the destruction of innocence.
Monday, May 5, 2014
World War III Has Already Been Lost
The title is bold, but it is all out in the open. By tomorrow at this time, you will know the entire story and what America will look like in the coming months. Fasten your seatbelt and make sure you store food, water and ammunition because the train has left the station and AmeriKa is headed for a head-on train wreck of epic proportions.
Last night, May 4, 2014, I interviewed Dr. Jim Garrow, the 43 year ex-CIA veteran who is exposing many NWO plots, at least to the level that his national security oath will let him. In promoting the show, I was purposely vague because I knew where I was going to take the show, because I knew the areas that Dr. Garrow has been speaking about in other interviews. However, I was preparing to take this interview to a level not yet heard on talk radio. I was vague in my show description because I wanted the show to not be taken down by the powers that be. However, the first 10 minutes of my show we were still tampered with as Dr. Garrow, News Director Annie DeRiso and myself all experienced independent and simultaneous communications issues. Dr. Garrow and I subsequently changed our communications venues and the show proceeded.
In a two part series, I am writing a brief synopsis of the last two hours of the interview which will contain some revelations, on my part, that I did not fully cover last night. The reason that some critical issues did not get covered last night is because Dr. Garrow cannot talk about some of the issues because of his national security oath and I did not want to place him in a position of looking like he had been talking about what he is not supposed be revealing. As it was, Dr. Garrow refused to answer 5 questions I put to him last night in deference to his national security oath.
After this two part series has a chance to circulate, I will release the second and third hours of the interview late tomorrow night or on Wednesday morning.
Information Not Yet Revealed
Since early last August, I have been holding on to some information that I was told I better keep quiet unless I was able to collaborate some of the information with another well known source and this was necessary for my own personal safety. To be the sole purveyor of this information would have placed me in a greatly compromised position similar to Breitbart, Hastings and Clancy. After nine plus months, it is a relief to finally get this out into the public arena.
Much of what I am going to reveal is going to read like a jig saw puzzle. I am going to reveal a story of Chinese takeover of this country and Dr. Garrow provides complementary and novel information to the level of which he is permitted to speak.
The Bundy Affair
Cliven Bundy sits on land that is mineral rich in addition to being selected to be a Solar Energy Zone controlled by the Chinese energy company ENN. Dr. Garrow revealed that there are already Chinese soldiers on the Bundy Ranch and this information was provided to him by the Bundy’s themselves in a private dinner Dr. Garrow had with members of Bundy family.
Dr. Garrow also revealed that Bundy’s land is rich in mineral resources and the Chinese have been promised control over all of our underground and surface mineral resources. The Bundy Affair is critically important because it exposed critical elements of the turnover of this country’s wealth to the Chinese in payment for our debt to China.
Soon, China will own every important aspect of American wealth and those of us that remain alive following the coming purge will be living in a third world country. Notice what I just said here, (1) those of left alive. and (2) living in a third world country. In Part Two of this series, I will be revealing exactly how this will happen. Let me just suffice it to say that gold, all forms of energy, water and food production will become a part of the Chinese takeover as will the breakup of the Federal Reserve in a divestiture of such a magnitude, that it has never before seen in the modern world.
Chinese Solar Energy Zones
The readers may recall that I recently wrote an article in which I noted that these Chinese Solar Energy Zones were near a CANAMEX Corridor transportation system, backed up next to a major military installation and were mineral resource rich. The American military will be forced to join the Chinese takeover. The highway system is important from a military perspective in order to quickly move troops and material to needed areas of insurrection. Now does it make sense as to why there is a purge of the military leadership taking place in which over 260 senior level military officers have been fired by Obama? Does the John Warner Defense Act make sense to you now because it allows the use of US troops on American soil for policing duties which will be needed to put down any resulting rebellion? Do you think that the DHS acquiring over 2 billion rounds of ammunition to go with their 2700 armored personnel carriers makes any sense in light of this information? And I have been told that Tom Clancy had all of this information and more and this is why he was killed because he was writing a book about all of this. If you are still connecting dots, let me put this in very simply terms, there is going to be a civil war and it is going to happen soon.
Further, Dr. Garrow acknowledged the connections between these Chinese Solar Energy Zones and land rich in mineral resources. I have also previously written an article in which I identified how the United States has hundreds of trillions of dollars of estimated buried resource wealth beneath the surface and our government refuses to touch it. Our government refuses to access these underground treasures because they have been promised to the Chinese in repayment of the debt owed to their country.
The Crisis in Ukraine
Putin has Eastern Europe knuckling under to his will. Both Dr. Garrow and I agree that this will cause the breakup of NATO and Putin’s military will run unopposed through Europe. I asked Dr. Garrow about the window we are in with regard to NATO consolidating forces necessary to oppose a Russian invasion, through a series of war games, in Moldova, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Poland this coming June/July. If Putin is going to control Ukraine, which accounts for 66% of Russian gas flowing into Europe, he cannot allow NATO to consolidate its forces and oppose his takeover plans of Ukraine. Dr. Garrow did comment on this point, however, I have multiple insider sources stating that this is an accurate assessment. I have been told that there is a window of about 4-5 weeks until Russia attacks Ukraine. If Putin misses this window, he will have to be content to continue to erode the Petrodollar because NATO will be significantly entrenched enough to easily roll over Ukraine and Eastern Europe. Putin is bold and impulsive and the slow approach of eroding the Petrodollar does not fit his personality. Putin will attack Ukraine.
Obama Could Have Saved Europe From Russia
Dr. Garrow revealed that Obama has both the ability and authority to order the capture the 30% bleed off and to liquefy the natural gas and ship it Eastern Europe and undercut the Russian price on natural gas. This would have halted Putin in his tracks. This would have been similar to what Truman did to keep Berlin open in 1947 when the Russians shut down outside access to Berlin and Truman initiated the Berlin Airlift. However, being the traitor that Obama is, he refused to act to save Eastern Europe. As a result, both Dr. Garrow and my insider sources believe that it is just a matter of time until all of Europe is subservient to Putin’s re-emergence of the Soviet Empire. This speaks to the fact that we do indeed have a traitor in the Oval Office. Europe will soon fall to Russia and America will fall to China. This is the real New World Order!
The Federal Reserve
America is being carved up like a Thanksgiving turkey and one has to wonder where is the Federal Reserve in all of this? Since they have owned this country since 1913, shouldn’t we be hearing about their role in all of this? Isn’t it interesting that Harry Reid, according to Dr. Garrow, is facilitating all of these Chinese Solar Energy Zones and not the Federal Reserve. What is going here would be like you having a garage sale, but the Chinese are in your house and your backyard and they are the ones determining what you will be selling in your driveway. Yes, that’s right, the Federal Reserve is dead as we know it and Part Two will reveal the relevant details.
Conclusion
To sum up, Part One details how the Chinese are on the verge of controlling all American energy and meaningful resources including our military. Russia will soon be controlling Europe and both Chinese and Russian forces will be imposing their will on the American people in the coming months.
You now know about 25% of what has been revealed to me. Patience is a virtue, because what I am about to reveal tomorrow will change the face of America, forever!
Part Two will discuss the coming EMP attack, currency collapse and actions of both Chinese and Russian military forces. Once Part Two is published, it will be clear to those who regularly read my column how I have written about various aspects of this coming takedown of America since last August. And in case anyone is wondering, this information has been disseminated to trusted sources for all the appropriate reasons.
Friday, May 2, 2014
Hillary Clinton's Ideal Running Mate?
Here's an interesting article from the Daily Beast. Who is the ideal running mate, you may ask? Why Bill Clinton, of course. Let's take the term "dynasty" to a whole new level.
http://news.yahoo.com/ready-hillary-running-mate-094500749--politics.html
http://news.yahoo.com/ready-hillary-running-mate-094500749--politics.html
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
General beefs about the growing inequality in this country
Well, this is an attempt to start a thoughtful discussion about inequality that is likely going to end in nothing but a partisan pissing match with use of the words socialist, communist or some other stupid "ist" and complete avoidance of the point I will try to make. We'll probably get some trickle down bullshit thrown in there for good measure. My biggest beef I suppose is that we have created a massive inequality. It didn't just happen because a select few are so much smarter than everyone else, rather, we have used tax policy, deregulation, bad trade policy, and massive devaluing of the dollar to bequeath upon a very few a wealth that I do not believe they deserve. Moreover, we have simultaneously yanked up many ladders that previously could be used by those willing to work hard to climb. The fact that a loudmouth like myself could earn north of 100K at one point in my working career with nothing more than a GED is a strong testament to what was once a functioning society that allowed people to screw up, start over, and get moving forward. If you don't graduate high school today let alone, heaven forbid, get arrested for something like possession or selling a small amount of drugs, you are simply screwed. Again, I believe we have CHOSEN to create the disaster we have now. Part of the problem is a simple matter of supply and demand as Lou alluded to another page. But the other part of it is that we have created a situation where competition is primarily what little people do, while the few are allowed to coast along. Undoubtedly, the wealthy pay the majority of taxes, this is simple math because, DING, they make the most money. What helps grow their wealth, however, is a lot of direct and indirect contributions from the rest of us that, IMO, is simply a government sanctioned shake down. Here is part of my belief of the mechanics of it.
The FED- shouldn't be much disagreement here. Endlessly low rates allow business access to very cheap capital. Savers and those who buy fixed income for lower risk have flat out been screwed. yeah, higher rates mean higher inflation and higher costs paid by those on fixed income, but it also means business needs to pay more for its labor. Low inflation (a lie to begin with) has been used to deny COLA raises and the perpetually weak dollar has hurt those fixed income as well. As for the rest of us who work hourly, like myself, yearly raises, outside of union shops, are less than the already bullshit low stated rate of inflation. Stocks, of course, are doing well, which is another sweet treat for those with assets supported by those of us with fewer. Yeah, my 401k NOW is doing well, but will look less sweet years from now when we finally become adults and raise taxes. Lastly, through cheap rates and lack of supervision, the banks have been given a license to steal and steal they have while creating an enormous pool of unsecured risk that WILL blow up again. Whether we bail them out again or not, we will all pay dearly for it one way or the other while those who caused the damage will walk away with literally billions
Taxes- Under Reagan, we played the game of reduce the rate and take away deductions and then added them all back. What I see since 1980 is that when taxes go down, wealth at the very top climbs and shrinks in the middle. Some will undoubtedly believe these are not related. Taxes for money earned through investment is taxed less that money that is earned through labor. This is bullshit. Income is income and millionaires who flip stocks in a manipulated market kept aloft by the fed (see above) should have to pay taxes the same way that I do. Again, they pay more, because they earn more and then they pay less because they can take advantage of tax scams. As for our corporations, many love to wail about how we have the highest corporate tax rate in the world while they know full well that our coporations simply do not pay that rate. Through tax arbitrage, companies are allowed to stockpile and hide cash that, thanks to a growing ratio of CEO to avg worker pay, is then siphoned off by top management and BOD's through a host of manipulations that are nothing more than tax dodges on money earned. I'll admit, my health care plan is a tax dodge as is my ability to park money temporarily in a 401K. At best, however, I am dodging a couple grand in tax while others are literally dodging millions simply because they can run better scams.
Education- ours sucks and it's getting worse. This is a multifaceted issue that the left must take some ownership of. Still, education currently is just about the only way to gain upward mobility and access to good education is getting harder and harder for everyone not rich, let alone the very poor who, thanks to roll backs in affirmative action, will find it even harder. Will legacy admissions for children of rich parents be taken away? not likely. Not much meritocracy there. In some ways, I was very lucky to have NOT gone to college after getting my GED because I was much more mature when I finally went and got very good grades that paid dividends later when I applied for nursing school. I am a white guy, who is decent looking and I have never once been discriminated over for someone of color. On the other hand, I could count several times where I believe the reverse was true for me. The failure starts early in school, and children from poor families do worse, and in response, we are cutting head start programs. This seems ridiculous. If we really wanted people to not sit on their ass, why are we de-incentivizing them to work hard?
Speaking of that, wages- Unions have been their best and worst advocates. I never liked working union shop, but collective bargaining by labor at large corporations helped set the cost of labor elsewhere. It would be awesome if, as an RN, I could be paid based on something other than a commoditized view of labor, but I can't. I'm not getting overly squeezed, but the same cannot be said for those who used to have something useful to do. Again, it's a matter of degree of what is fair. Is it good for the majority to lose jobs to third world countries while those who hold capital are becoming engorged largely by arbitraging the cost of labor in addition to paying less for labor despite increased productivity? I dont' think so.
These are just a few things and likely not many will read to this point. Thanks if you have.
The FED- shouldn't be much disagreement here. Endlessly low rates allow business access to very cheap capital. Savers and those who buy fixed income for lower risk have flat out been screwed. yeah, higher rates mean higher inflation and higher costs paid by those on fixed income, but it also means business needs to pay more for its labor. Low inflation (a lie to begin with) has been used to deny COLA raises and the perpetually weak dollar has hurt those fixed income as well. As for the rest of us who work hourly, like myself, yearly raises, outside of union shops, are less than the already bullshit low stated rate of inflation. Stocks, of course, are doing well, which is another sweet treat for those with assets supported by those of us with fewer. Yeah, my 401k NOW is doing well, but will look less sweet years from now when we finally become adults and raise taxes. Lastly, through cheap rates and lack of supervision, the banks have been given a license to steal and steal they have while creating an enormous pool of unsecured risk that WILL blow up again. Whether we bail them out again or not, we will all pay dearly for it one way or the other while those who caused the damage will walk away with literally billions
Taxes- Under Reagan, we played the game of reduce the rate and take away deductions and then added them all back. What I see since 1980 is that when taxes go down, wealth at the very top climbs and shrinks in the middle. Some will undoubtedly believe these are not related. Taxes for money earned through investment is taxed less that money that is earned through labor. This is bullshit. Income is income and millionaires who flip stocks in a manipulated market kept aloft by the fed (see above) should have to pay taxes the same way that I do. Again, they pay more, because they earn more and then they pay less because they can take advantage of tax scams. As for our corporations, many love to wail about how we have the highest corporate tax rate in the world while they know full well that our coporations simply do not pay that rate. Through tax arbitrage, companies are allowed to stockpile and hide cash that, thanks to a growing ratio of CEO to avg worker pay, is then siphoned off by top management and BOD's through a host of manipulations that are nothing more than tax dodges on money earned. I'll admit, my health care plan is a tax dodge as is my ability to park money temporarily in a 401K. At best, however, I am dodging a couple grand in tax while others are literally dodging millions simply because they can run better scams.
Education- ours sucks and it's getting worse. This is a multifaceted issue that the left must take some ownership of. Still, education currently is just about the only way to gain upward mobility and access to good education is getting harder and harder for everyone not rich, let alone the very poor who, thanks to roll backs in affirmative action, will find it even harder. Will legacy admissions for children of rich parents be taken away? not likely. Not much meritocracy there. In some ways, I was very lucky to have NOT gone to college after getting my GED because I was much more mature when I finally went and got very good grades that paid dividends later when I applied for nursing school. I am a white guy, who is decent looking and I have never once been discriminated over for someone of color. On the other hand, I could count several times where I believe the reverse was true for me. The failure starts early in school, and children from poor families do worse, and in response, we are cutting head start programs. This seems ridiculous. If we really wanted people to not sit on their ass, why are we de-incentivizing them to work hard?
Speaking of that, wages- Unions have been their best and worst advocates. I never liked working union shop, but collective bargaining by labor at large corporations helped set the cost of labor elsewhere. It would be awesome if, as an RN, I could be paid based on something other than a commoditized view of labor, but I can't. I'm not getting overly squeezed, but the same cannot be said for those who used to have something useful to do. Again, it's a matter of degree of what is fair. Is it good for the majority to lose jobs to third world countries while those who hold capital are becoming engorged largely by arbitraging the cost of labor in addition to paying less for labor despite increased productivity? I dont' think so.
These are just a few things and likely not many will read to this point. Thanks if you have.
The WH cover up of the cover up.
The smoking gun:
Previously unreleased internal Obama administration emails show that a coordinated effort was made in the days following the Benghazi terror attacks to portray the incident as “rooted in [an] Internet video, and not [in] a broader failure or policy.” Emails sent by senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials reveal an effort to insulate President Barack Obama from the attacks that killed four Americans. Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her infamous Sunday news show appearances to discuss the attack. The “goal,” according to these emails, was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.” Rice came under fierce criticism following her appearances on television after she adhered to these talking points and blamed the attack on a little-watched Internet video. The newly released internal White House e-mails show that Rice’s orders came from top Obama administration communications officials.
Here's a screenshot of that email, followed by another important discovery:

Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. In this communication, Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.”
See here:
Let's unpack this new information. First, two political process points: (1) As we've recently seen with the IRS scandal, the Benghazi outrage continues to produce previously unseen evidence -- destroying Democrats' disgraceful "phony scandals" talking point. The White House began aggressively dismissing both stories last year. (2) Ed Morrissey reminds us that the White House claimed to have released "all" of its emails on Benghazi nearly a year ago. Gabe Malor asks the right question: Why are we just seeing these ones now? Now, on substance, the first email embedded above reveals a White House in intense spin mode after a preventable terrorist attack that claimed the lives of four Americans, including a sitting Ambassador. We knew that Hillary Clinton's State Department and the CIA were involved in the administration's historical revisionism surrounding this attack. We now know for certain that top White House officials were in the loop, too. Ben Rhodes outlines four bullet points in his memorandum, the first three of which are misleading and/or false:
(a) The United States was not doing everything in its power to protect its people and facilities abroad. Not in Benghazi, and not elsewhere.
(b) The 9/11 attacks were not rooted in an "internet video." The clip he's referencing made something of a splash in the Middle East, but the State Department's second in command on the ground in Libya called it a "non event" vis-a-vis the Benghazi raid. The US government, including Sec. Clinton and CIA Director Petraeus, knew the attack was a coordinated terrorist action almost immediately.
(c) The administration has not been "resolute" in bringing the perpetrators to justice. More than a year-and-a-half has passed since the lethal event. Zero people have been held responsible, neither in Washington nor Northern Africa.
The memo also makes clear the White House was determined to deflect any criticism involving a "failure of [administration] policy." What sort of failure? Take your pick. How about fueling a war in Libya with no apparent strategy to handle the resulting power vacuum? Or rejecting repeated requests for an enhanced security presence in a city from which much of the West had withdrawn, due to growing jihadi dominance? Or renewing a lease on our compound with a waiver for substandard security after it had faced several attempted attacks? Perhaps it was the lack of preparation for the contingency of a terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11, which resulted in hours of paralysis while American lives hung in the balance. Rhodes and company wanted to insulate the president from those glaring policy failures, so they doctored up some deceptive talking points. As for the Susan Rice email, her staff obviously understood the true nature of the attack, which she would later tell the American people was "spontaneous." It wasn't. It was a deliberate, orchestrated, al Qaeda-linked act of terrorism. It's always seemed inconceivable that Rice wouldn't have been privy to those facts prior to her public statements. The newly-disclosed emails appear to confirm those suspicions. There can now be no remaining doubt: The administration's public response to the Benghazi attack was tainted by political considerations and deprived the American people of the truth.
Another law to encourage more businesses to move to California.
Apr 24, 2014, 1:21pm PDT
Bill proposes higher taxes on CEOs with high wage disparity
Allen Young | Sacramento Business Journal
Former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert
Reich, left, stands beside Sen. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord in the
Capitol on Thursday. Reich was on hand to help promote Senate Bill 1372,
which would raise state taxes on publicly traded companies that pay
their top-earning employee 100 times as much or more as the company's
average worker.
Despite a high-profile backing by former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, who joined lawmakers in Sacramento on Thursday to promote the bill, passage will require support from both the governor and some Republicans to garner a supermajority.
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Ralph Nader's World.
Should we impeach Obama, Legalize Drugs, Form a Progressive-Libertarian coalition to elect President Rand Paul? Just a few of Ralph Nader's proposals in his new book.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/ralph-naders-america-impeach-obama-decriminalize-drugs-libertarians-progressives-unite-110418813.html
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/ralph-naders-america-impeach-obama-decriminalize-drugs-libertarians-progressives-unite-110418813.html
A little news
Well, the NBA today dished out a smack down to Donal Sterling that I have to admit even I am surprised at. I also have mixed feelings about it. Reading the story HERE it was more than just a simple few words that previously had been quoted. What he said here is pure scumbag stuff and he seems to see himself as quite important and instrumental in providing his players with their salaries. The fans and advertisers have nothing to do with that of course. Anyhow, for the freedom lovers here, is it right that the NBA can exist as an organization that dictates rules so sternly that they can ban him from even attending a game? Should all sports organizations like the NBA, NFL, MBL and NHL be disbanded because they are so anti-capitalist? Better still, in a country with free speech, how can they legally restrict his? Shouldn't a militia being showing up to help him defend his ownership of the team?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
