Blocked Planned Parenthood Video May Show ‘Prima Facie Evidence Of Born Alive Infants’
Stem Express admits receiving "fully intact fetuses," says investigator David Daleiden
JULY 31, 2015 By Mollie Hemingway
Planned Parenthood is under fire for harvesting organs for sale from the babies they abort, but the journalistic project uncovering their participation in fetal organ trafficking has brought another nefarious aspect to the organ trade.
Remember what Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains’ Vice President and Medical Director, Dr. Savita Ginde, said in her meeting with people she believed to be purchasers of organs? Here’s an image from the video released earlier this week:
She says, “Sometimes, if we get, if someone delivers before we get to see them for a procedure, then we are intact.” According to the Center for Medical Progress, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains “does not use digoxin or other feticide in its 2nd trimester procedures” so “any intact deliveries before an abortion are potentially born-alive infants under federal law.”
While mainstream journalists continue to be reluctant about pursuing angles to this story, the journalist behind the project shared why he believes one of the companies that purchases aborted baby parts is desperate to keep him from publishing the story:
Remember, the Los Angeles Superior Court issued a limited, temporary restraining orderagainst the Center for Medical Progress. Under the terms of the order, the non-profit organization is banned from releasing video of a May lunch attended by three StemExpress officials. Daleiden says about that:
In a meeting with their top leadership where their leadership admitted that they sometimes get fully intact fetuses shipped to their laboratory from the abortion clinics they work with, and that could be prima facie evidence of born alive infants. And so that’s why they’re trying to suppress that videotape and they’re very scared of it.
The videotaped admission of this receipt of fully intact fetuses is what Stem Express is fighting so hard to suppress, Daleiden says. Whether they’re successful or not, now we may have a better understanding of why they’re trying to get the courts to keep this information hidden.
The full video is worth watching as well:
Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is a senior editor at The Federalist.
I've said before, I don't think there should be partial birth, late term abortions. If this is truly a matter that the baby is being fully born and then the abortion performed, it seems like murder to me.
ReplyDeleteThere are five more videos to come.
ReplyDelete"the Los Angeles Superior Court issued a limited, temporary restraining order against the Center for Medical Progress. Under the terms of the order, the non-profit organization is banned from releasing video of a May lunch attended by three StemExpress officials."
What is being covered up?
I honestly don't know William. I didn't see the first video, but after reading most of the full transcript versus the edited transcript, it looks to me that the video was edited to give a completely false picture. This is what fascist assholes do when they don't get their way.
DeleteAs an honest question, if mega corporations have protection laws that block them from being the target of "plants" who secretly videotape what goes on inside, why should PP be different?
So you just want to stick your head in the sand. Aren't doctors and nurses supposed to be dedicated to preserving life?
DeleteNot to worry max. The Democrat party of death will use proceedure to prevent debate on the Senate floor. The butchers will remain behind a shield.
"The Democrat party of death will use procedure to prevent debate on the Senate floor."
DeleteEvery time you point this out William, it makes me laugh because while you smugly claimed the righteousness of McConnell doing it, I knew that someday you would be pissed when the favor was returned.
To your first para, ,meh. I believe I am far more interested in the preservation of life as opposed to those who are interested only in the preservation of birth.
Not one Democrat voted today to end debate. Not one fucking Democrat. Not one.
DeleteThis is why I call for succession. The party who has won the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections is morally bankrupt, is mentally insane, supports these baby butchers.
The time has passed to try to have rational discussions with ass holes like you Max. I'm still waiting for your answer as to what week of pregnancy the soul enters the fetus.
You're covering up for these modern day Mengele's. You're as bad as they are.
Actually William, we did have some rational discussion about this a couple years ago. You're seething right now because you see injustice. I don't dismiss that as much as you might believe.
DeleteSomething that I don't think you will ever consider is that for someone like me who will become a health care provider, I don't really have the luxury to sit back and recommend treatments for patients based solely on whether or not I agree with it. I've been offended already by some of the things people have said that they thought were funny in the office. Nonetheless, they are there to get help and I have to meet them on their turf and consider the entirety of that individual, not just the thing that brought them to the office.
You're hurling the epithets because of your outrage. Fair enough. Now how bout getting off your ass and doing something useful and compassionate to lower abortions instead of bitching about it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deletehttp://www.pakfiles.com/watch-human-capital-episode-1-planned-parenthoods-black-market-in-baby-parts-WHcyeGk5bWhtdW8=
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjCs_gvImyw
Here you go max
Alright, so I watched it. Now what? That's your basic Saul Alinsky tactic of making someone defend the indefensible and assuming that by putting someone in that spot, you have made yourself righteous by default. There is an embedded premise there that PP is existing solely to dismember fetuses and make a profit. This is false. It's not like they said to themselves, "Hey, there is a niche that wants fetal tissues and if we build an organization that is 95% NOT abortion, we can than make a shit ton of money on something that is 2% of what we do"
DeleteKind of interesting I get chided as being comparable to a modern day Mengele via an effort that would make Goebbels proud. They may get their way.
Your problem is that you don't reconize that you are defending evil. You being a medical insider that saddens me and deeply worries me.
DeleteI'm still waiting for your answer as to what week of pregnancy the soul enters the fetus.
DeleteWilliam,Max has not at this point responded to your question. I wonder if you would consider an alternative viewpoint?.
I speak as an agnostic(not and Atheist). We are that group who some call skeptics, some call fence sitters and some simply ignore any belief other than their own.
So to your questionWilliam,for myself I simply do not know and it is not something which occupies any of my thinking time. We shall find out in the end if there is something beyond our ken. If there is not, then the big black will swallow us up and those left behind will continue the debate which is unnecessary in the first place.
There is one thing quite certain in the abortion debate. A woman and her physician are the only people who should have the right to decide on termination of a pregnancy. As to the designer babies set and the apparent termination when the “wrong” sex is conceived, this is a foul and despicable thing which needs maximum preventive measures.
We are talking about manipulating abortions to supply tissue and organ farms. The is illegal and should be prosecuted.
DeleteI agree that a woman and her physical should decide without governmental fingerprints. But, you neglect the father's right to influence the decision. Many men run away leaving their 50% of the equation without representation.
William
DeleteI can agree that the wishes of the potential father must be considered as a courtesy. However, the continuance of the pregnancy should be at the sole discretion of the prospective mother and her doctor.
We now give legal rights to gay spouses yet negate the wishes of a husband in a traditional marriage when it comes to the elimination of his DNA. Brave new world. King would grant him a "courtesy" consultation, then off we go, snip, snip, crush, crush, two hours later pick me up honey and take me home.
DeleteI stand corrected on a previous statement. Two Democrat senators voted to end debate on defunding Planned Parenthood. These two."men" obviously are participating in "the war on women."
William
DeleteSorry but I had not envisioned the situation where married couples would demand an abortion as a matter of convenience. To protect the health of the prospective mother or to avoid the possibility of birth defects ,Downs etc are the exceptions I would expect. Nevertheless, the primary responsibility rests with the mother. As an example, to continue with a pregnancy which has occurred as a result of carelessness or accident when there was an intent to prevent pregnancy is an intolerable burden on the woman. Future pregnancy is available to the couple if desired and this must be preferable to an unwanted baby simply because the father decides it is "his right" to spread his DNA around.
I detest the idea of abortion. However, I recognize that the current conservative battle is going nowhere because making abortion illegal (again) will not solve the problem. It will just drive the abortion trade underground (again), dramatically increasing the dangers to the women who submit themselves to the back alley abortionist.
ReplyDeleteInstead of attacking the supply side, conservatives need to attack the demand side. In other words, make free birth control socially acceptable and readily available. That is the only way to reduce abortions and maintain women's rights.
Medicaid, BC pills FREEEE.
DeleteACA insurance, BC pills FREEE.
Personal Insurance, BC pills FREEE.
Employer insurance, BC pills FREEE.
The ACA mandate BC pills be free unless you work for exempt organizations. Seems more like a lazy problem than anything else.
Seems they are readily available today. Perhaps an education issue.
52 years ago I learned about rubbers in health class. This isn't a matter of sex education. This is a matter of stupidity and social degradation.
DeleteLeave it at stupidity.
Delete