2009 The year Obama took over the Presidency the National Debt was 10 Trillion.
2014 The current National Debt is 17.5 Trillion. 151K per Taxpayer.
Obama’s Speech Against Raising the Debt Ceiling in 2006
March 16, 2006 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE S2237-2238:
“Mr. OBAMA. Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America’s debt problem.
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to
$8.6 trillion. That is ‘‘trillion’’ with a ‘‘T.’’ That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers. And over the next 5 years, between now and 2011, the President’s budget will increase the debt by almost another $3.5 trillion.
Numbers that large are sometimes hard to understand. Some people may wonder why they matter. Here is why: This year, the Federal Government will spend $220 billion on interest. That is more money to pay interest on our national debt than we’ll spend on Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. That is more money to pay interest on our debt this year than we will spend on education, homeland security, transportation, and veterans benefits combined. It is more money in one year than we are likely to spend to rebuild the devastated gulf coast in a way that honors the best of America.
And the cost of our debt is one of the fastest growing expenses in the Federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing our cities and States of critical investments in infrastructure like bridges, ports, and levees; robbing our families and our children of critical investments in education and health care reform; robbing our seniors of the retirement and
health security they have counted on.
Every dollar we pay in interest is a dollar that is not going to investment in America’s priorities. Instead, interest payments are a significant tax on all Americans—a debt tax that Washington doesn’t want to talk about. If Washington were serious about honest tax relief in this country, we would see an effort to reduce our national debt by returning to responsible fiscal policies.
But we are not doing that. Despite repeated efforts by Senators CONRAD and FEINGOLD, the Senate continues to reject a return to the commonsense Pay-go rules that used to apply. Previously, Pay-go rules applied both to increases in mandatory spending and
to tax cuts. The Senate had to abide by the commonsense budgeting principle of balancing expenses and revenues. Unfortunately, the principle was abandoned, and now the demands of budget discipline apply only to spending.
As a result, tax breaks have not been paid for by reductions in Federal spending, and thus the only way to pay for them has been to increase our deficit to historically high levels and borrow more and more money. Now we have to pay for those tax breaks plus
the cost of borrowing for them. Instead of reducing the deficit, as some people claimed, the fiscal policies of this administration and its allies in Congress will add more than $600 million in debt for each of the next 5 years.
That is why I will once again cosponsor the Pay-go amendment and continue to hope that my colleagues will return to a smart rule that has worked in the past and can work again.
Our debt also matters internationally. My friend, the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, likes to remind us that it took 42 Presidents 224 years to run up only $1 trillion of foreign-held debt. This administration did more than that in just 5 years. Now, there is nothing wrong with borrowing from foreign countries. But we must remember that the more we depend on foreign nations to lend us money, the more our economic security is tied to the whims of foreign leaders whose interests might not be aligned with ours.
Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that ‘‘the buck stops here.’’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.
I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit”
Senator Obama seems confused. He wants to cut the National Debt so he can spend more on social programs. I'm not sure how that would work. Anyway, the "foreign held debt" IS the interest owed on Treasury notes and bonds held by foreign interests, not the total loan amounts. Oh well. And, yes, I agree he sounds like a Republican.
ReplyDeleteMick, I know you touched on this before but could you explain to me why debt issued to US individuals and private institutions is of no concern to the American taxpayer and why this interest owed isn't just as harmful as debt interest owed to a foreign entity except of coarse for the increase in foreign held reserves when the interest is paid. Thanks
ReplyDeletePrimarily because the interest earned by American citizens, and corporations, who, under our laws are also citizens, is for the most part, returned to the economy in the form of purchases, taxes and in the case of corporate investments, wages and capital outlays for equipment and supplies. Interest paid to foreign investors is mostly lost to the U.S. economy.
ReplyDeleteHe did respond to the media when asked about his statement. He said then it was all about politics.
ReplyDeleteAnd it's not all about politics now.
DeleteWow, what a surprise!
DeleteIn other words he lies 100% of the time. Even when service persons lives are on the line. Mick, what is your projection when the national debt does become problematical?
Delete20 Trillion?
Delete50 Trillion?
100 Trillion?
After all, we owe 85% of it to ourselves. So at this point what difference does it make?
DeleteWhen the amount of national debt held my foreign interests exceeds that held by U.S. citizens we are toast.
DeleteThere is an argument that having foreign interests hold our paper while the fed artificially depresses the rate of interest substantially benefits us.
DeleteWhat difference does it make?
DeleteNone as long as your not holding the treasury or bond and want to redeem them.