tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post6146813804966575729..comments2024-03-27T15:31:49.368-07:00Comments on American Politics: ComeyTwinsdadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07768095454310182677noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-40640843717426184972015-10-31T16:25:12.038-07:002015-10-31T16:25:12.038-07:00Of course you are Rick.Of course you are Rick.loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-38542331412580051362015-10-31T07:53:57.808-07:002015-10-31T07:53:57.808-07:00Yes we are tired of hearing about the damn emails....Yes we are tired of hearing about the damn emails.rick0427https://www.blogger.com/profile/16896247508408180825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-76733198435984278722015-10-29T08:44:20.423-07:002015-10-29T08:44:20.423-07:00Iraq, not Iran.Iraq, not Iran.loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-82011638766740234692015-10-29T08:43:43.238-07:002015-10-29T08:43:43.238-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-73342830195969032782015-10-29T08:16:58.288-07:002015-10-29T08:16:58.288-07:00Pretty fair assessment Lou. Pretty fair assessment Lou. Max Yasgurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02816449822816423030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-68661242912148845492015-10-28T17:45:47.213-07:002015-10-28T17:45:47.213-07:00Both parties are much the same.
During the Bush y...Both parties are much the same.<br /><br />During the Bush years the right screamed to no end about the travesty of blaming Bush for his transgressions, i.e. Iran when his decisions were based on information provided by the CIA.<br />https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm<br /><br />Today the left screams bloody murder over the what difference does it make for Hillary's transgressions.<br /><br />As a side note, some would say anyone with a brain larger than a gnat would always use a government server to prevent possible sensitive information from being hacked.<br /><br />The Times said most experts believed private email accounts should only be used for official government business in emergencies, according to the Times.<br /><br />Clinton’s penchant for private email would indeed run afoul of the current law on the books—but likely not the rules that were in place while she served as President Obama’s secretary of state between 2009 and 2013. Under a law passed this past November, a government official can use private email accounts to conduct government business—but only if that official copies or forwards the email to his or her government account within 20 days.<br /><br />The law was passed specifically due to the indiscretions of Clinton.<br /><br />My opinion, she will skate free.<br /><br />Why? <br /><br />People are tired of the clown show called Hillary's server.<br /><br /><br />loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-70362217204770250292015-10-28T17:08:22.112-07:002015-10-28T17:08:22.112-07:00Lou
My thanks. Huff Post article, even with its le...Lou<br />My thanks. Huff Post article, even with its left leaning bias has a point. The law HRC is accused of breaking appears not to have become effective until she had left office. The Blogs following the article appear to support this contention, we must however remember the political bias of the publication.<br />Perhaps time for another question. Do the Dem supporters care about the raking over of the coals of long dead fires? Do the undecided independents give credence to the Pub bias in the Gowdy hearings and most important of all, have any of the Pub candidates given any indication that they could be a better POTUS than HRC. Am I being unfair to suggest that the complete system needs overhaul as you are now not getting a chance to elect someone who deserves the job on merit?.<br /><br />I must look into your references, they will, as always, prove to be worth pursuing<br /><br />Cheers from Aussie<br />Kingstonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15166346882352724420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-39867621815619377882015-10-28T15:53:38.146-07:002015-10-28T15:53:38.146-07:00A little something from the Huffington Post, left ...A little something from the Huffington Post, left leaning:<br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/03/hillary-clinton-emails_n_6791530.html<br /><br />http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-may-broken-federal-laws-record-keeping-063609181.html;_ylt=A86.JyEIUTFWsGUANSknnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByMXM3OWtoBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwM4BHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg--<br /><br />Two laws apply to the mishandling of classified data on unsecure networks.<br /><br />The first is 18 USC Sec. 1924, which outlaws the unauthorized removal and storage of classified information. Penalties can include fines and imprisonment for up to one year.<br /><br />That statute was used to prosecute retired Army General David Petraeus, a former CIA director who provided classified documents to his mistress and biographer, Paula Broadwell. Petraeus was sentenced to two years’ probation and a $40,000 fine as part of a plea deal in March.<br /><br />A second federal statute that prosecutors could use to charge Clinton and her aides is 18 USC Sec. 793, a more serious felony statute .<br /><br />That law covers national defense information and people who misuse it to injure the United States or benefit a foreign power.<br /><br />Those convicted of violating that law face fines and up to 10 years in prison.loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-69778484744692322552015-10-28T15:34:52.460-07:002015-10-28T15:34:52.460-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Kingstonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15166346882352724420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-33362628869473460652015-10-28T15:31:11.628-07:002015-10-28T15:31:11.628-07:00I make no comment on Williams post but I do have a...I make no comment on Williams post but I do have a question. I clicked onto the first reference "Charged with breaking several laws" and was connected to a publication "Daily Caller:". If this is an authority for the piece by William, could someone please advise as to the hard copy circulation of the publication. <br /><br />Here in Aust we seem to have few publications of this nature available mainstream, in fact I would have to search quite assiduously to find any at all. In addition to the above, what influence, if any, do publications such as Daily Caller have on the general populace?.<br />I apologize for the seemingly pointless question but my knowledge of publishing in US is limited to Rupert Murdoch and the late Random Hurst. To more fully understand the electoral debates, I need to get a handle on other than the mainstream media.<br /><br />Cheers from Aussie<br />Kingstonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15166346882352724420noreply@blogger.com