tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post5212195719415181672..comments2024-03-27T15:31:49.368-07:00Comments on American Politics: Summers Used To Be Much Hotter In The USTwinsdadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07768095454310182677noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-27688655523248483392014-06-24T17:52:45.402-07:002014-06-24T17:52:45.402-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.rick0427https://www.blogger.com/profile/16896247508408180825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-74676067006682959312014-06-24T15:38:42.025-07:002014-06-24T15:38:42.025-07:00@Louman hey how are you angry old man? hope all is...@Louman hey how are you angry old man? hope all is well. <br /><br /><br />@William. William no one disputes that the decade of the 1930's was hot. Probably cumulatively the hottest average ten year period since records were kept. That my friend is weather not climate. Climate change takes into account long term trends, yes longer then ten years and William that ten year span is factored into the overall picture. But as hot as it was it seems that 2005 and 2010 are the hottest individual years on record. No one is polling anything William. You say that all historical data has been manipulated. I knew this was coming from you because this has become the new mantra of climate deniers as all other means to deny climate change become either proven false or become obsolete, temperature manipulation. So if all temperature has been manipulated by whomever for the money they get paid to say "Global Warming" ,then why not believe these guys, even if it is only one family, that has no dog in that hunt. rick0427https://www.blogger.com/profile/16896247508408180825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-36031942942601189322014-06-24T11:54:01.532-07:002014-06-24T11:54:01.532-07:00William, I am not aware of data tampering. I would...William, I am not aware of data tampering. I would be interested in learning more of this.Mickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10957066214035948958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-3888848160871785912014-06-24T04:50:43.419-07:002014-06-24T04:50:43.419-07:00When will you learn, Ric is always right. His wor...When will you learn, Ric is always right. His word is law like Obama's. loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-55473749977431021462014-06-24T04:43:21.991-07:002014-06-24T04:43:21.991-07:00One families data point against historical evidenc...One families data point against historical evidence that has been manipulated.<br /><br />Science is not a poll. We do not vote about science.<br /><br />Please explain the temperature readings during the mid 1930's ric.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12064694227628006142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-52952008055500281372014-06-24T02:46:13.191-07:002014-06-24T02:46:13.191-07:00Yes William I have heard the story of NOAA and gov...Yes William I have heard the story of NOAA and govt agencies using false temperature readings based on models not on facts. I have but one response William :<br /><br />http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100507101912.htm<br /><br />They do it as a hobby William, for the fun of it why would these guys falsify anything William? They are not paid, they have never moved the thermometer in 114 years. <br /> Now William I am not always right in fact none of us are. <br />Everything written here on the blog is opinion, opinion is never right or wrong.<br /> But William give me a good rebuttal to these guys. See you can't so you attack.<br /> Yes William it is one single family, but probably the one weather monitoring station in America with the most accurate figures to be found. By your own admittance all the others are falsifying shit. These guys aren't and they not only say that in their 114 years of records the climate is warming in NY but it has increased in the last decade or so. But read Mick above climate change is global. We need more honest data from other places since the whole world wide weather system is rigged against your argument that warming isn't happening. 97% of science says it is. William I got to believe that the 3% who say it isn't are also getting paid by someone to say what that someone wants to hear. It's also a business arrangement. rick0427https://www.blogger.com/profile/16896247508408180825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-4809008108889921652014-06-24T02:39:10.484-07:002014-06-24T02:39:10.484-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.rick0427https://www.blogger.com/profile/16896247508408180825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-78479162457839297532014-06-23T18:29:44.524-07:002014-06-23T18:29:44.524-07:00Your response concerning the tampering of historic...Your response concerning the tampering of historical data?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12064694227628006142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-30206110291657756292014-06-23T18:26:42.588-07:002014-06-23T18:26:42.588-07:00Of course ric you are always correct. One family c...Of course ric you are always correct. One family compared to all of the other data presented. One single family.<br /><br />What is your response concerning the tampering of historical data? Care to correct me in regards to that?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12064694227628006142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-75519732407631325482014-06-23T15:10:54.289-07:002014-06-23T15:10:54.289-07:00http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/10050...http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100507101912.htm<br /><br />I bring this once again. This is a single extended family, paid by no one who have been tracking the weather for over a century just because they want to. It's a hobby passed down through the generations. They have never moved their tracking station, they went out twice a day took their readings and recorded them. William this trumps all your arguments about who's moving what and who's getting paid. rick0427https://www.blogger.com/profile/16896247508408180825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-78336247149686475832014-06-23T13:44:01.475-07:002014-06-23T13:44:01.475-07:00William, you are correct, the U.S. weather has bee...William, you are correct, the U.S. weather has been going through a cooling trend however, one of the papers cited in your post clearly shows that the U.S weather trends are counter to global trends for the period. <br /><br />http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/Mickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10957066214035948958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-22121532883077945782014-06-23T06:55:17.135-07:002014-06-23T06:55:17.135-07:00More on the new and better recording stations by N...More on the new and better recording stations by NOAA<br />Posted on June 22, 2014 by john1282 | 2 Comments<br /><br />"Anthony Watts, who exposed the siting problems and showed ridiculous siting, for example, an hour down the road in Lampasas TX they moved the temp monitor <br />from a rural location to a parking lot."<br /><br />http://junkscience.com/2014/06/22/more-on-the-new-and-better-recording-stations-by-noaa/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12064694227628006142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-9222201730877973472014-06-23T06:37:48.203-07:002014-06-23T06:37:48.203-07:00Climate Consultants
Posted on June 22, 2014 by ste...Climate Consultants<br />Posted on June 22, 2014 by stevengoddard<br /><br />I work as a consultant, and I get paid for delivering what the client wants.<br /><br />Climate scientists work as consultants to the government, who pays their contracts. Either they deliver what the government wants, or their funding gets cut off.<br /><br />It is not a conspiracy. Rather it is a simple business arrangement. Everyone who works in climate science understands it.<br /><br />But their work certainly has nothing to do with either climate or science. They are propagandists on a $29 billion/year budget.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12064694227628006142noreply@blogger.com