tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post3806983625227363219..comments2024-03-29T00:16:51.148-07:00Comments on American Politics: SAP: Who's going down? Hillary or the FBI?Twinsdadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07768095454310182677noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-86555160048682205752016-01-23T21:36:28.867-08:002016-01-23T21:36:28.867-08:00And why should she be indicted?
Was Lois Lerner i...And why should she be indicted?<br /><br />Was Lois Lerner indicted?<br /><br />Was anyone held responsible in the IRS?<br /><br />Was Jeff Neely indicted? <br /><br />How many people in the VA were indicted?<br /><br />How many connected to the F35 were indicted?<br /><br />How many people were held responsible for all the green energy loans given to businesses that went bankrupt?<br /><br />Having said all that, how many were demoted or faced discipline?<br /><br />NO ONE IN GOVERNMENT IS EVER HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS SO WHY SHOULD HILLY? BILLY LIED AND WAS NOT HELD ACCOUNTABLE WHY SHOULD HIS WIFE?<br /><br /><br />loumanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04882146154150499756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-11788541147304321612016-01-23T18:44:24.338-08:002016-01-23T18:44:24.338-08:00Chicago Tribune Editorial Board member Clarence Pa...Chicago Tribune Editorial Board member Clarence Page and “McLaughlin Group” host John McLaughlin predicted the FBI will recommend Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton face prosecution for mishandling classified information on Friday.<br /><br />McLaughlin asked, “Forced prediction for the panel: the FBI will recommend that Hillary Clinton face prosecution for mishandling classified information? That’s the FBI. Yes or no?”<br /><br />Page stated, “I’m going to say yes, but she won’t be indicted.”<br /><br />McLaughlin responded, “I’m with you.”<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12064694227628006142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4066062120776667625.post-47340373430412652082016-01-22T09:41:47.309-08:002016-01-22T09:41:47.309-08:00Be careful what you wish for William. You have a s...Be careful what you wish for William. You have a single minded purpose to see Hillary be brought down for any reason that will stick to the wall, and you are happy to see any Alinsky tactic used to meet that goal. If it succeeds, eventually the same rules will bite a ton of other people, possibly even people you like. Even the author of this piece ADMITS that in the face of changed rules, he still communicated secret information in manners that violated the rules, which is kind of ironic given the rest of the tone of his piece. <br /><br />We have made a lot of information "secret" to avoid having to share it with the press. In Hillary's case, what they are basically hoping for now is that they can get her on a technicality of improperly handling the information. If they succeed, it will only be a matter of time before some event happens wherein it will be shown after the fact that the event likely could have been avoided if "secret" information was communicated to the appropriate response team. And then we will all wail and hand wring over the behavior of someone who covers their ass by saying, "I didn't have a secure way to transfer the information". Wether we like people in certain agencies or not, I think we need to choose carefully when picking a method to bring them down. Max Yasgurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02816449822816423030noreply@blogger.com